These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37539381)
21. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Roskies A Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):419-23. PubMed ID: 16901745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "One more time": time loops as a tool to investigate folk conceptions of moral responsibility and human agency. Giraud T; Neves Leal M; Cova F Synthese; 2023; 202(3):83. PubMed ID: 37655126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. On the Nature of Explanations Offered by Network Science: A Perspective From and for Practicing Neuroscientists. Bertolero MA; Bassett DS Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1272-1293. PubMed ID: 32441854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The self: from philosophy to cognitive neuroscience. Chiong W Neurocase; 2011 Jun; 17(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 21506043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The medicalization of ethics or ethicalization of neuroscience: Toward a conceptual re-examination. Namazi H; Mirikermanshahi S IBRO Neurosci Rep; 2024 Jun; 16():567-570. PubMed ID: 38764540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A neuron doctrine in the philosophy of neuroscience. Gold I; Stoljar D Behav Brain Sci; 1999 Oct; 22(5):809-30; discussion 831-69. PubMed ID: 11301571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Moral vindications. Kumar V Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():124-134. PubMed ID: 28545629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of neuroscience on philosophy. Churchland PS Neuron; 2008 Nov; 60(3):409-11. PubMed ID: 18995813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The 'I' of the beholder: studying the 'self' across the humanities and neuroscience. Pannese A Med Humanit; 2011 Dec; 37(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21865201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The concept of free will: philosophy, neuroscience and the law. Pockett S Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 17323343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neuroscience and the law: philosophical differences and practical constraints. Martell DA Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 19267425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The mind-brain gap and the neuroscience-psychiatry gap. Telles-Correia D J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Aug; 24(4):797-802. PubMed ID: 29498174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical issues in radiology: a philosophical perspective. Sia S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 19324932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental philosophy and the problem of free will. Nichols S Science; 2011 Mar; 331(6023):1401-3. PubMed ID: 21415346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A philosopher looks at neuroscience. Beedle AS J Neurosci Res; 1999 Jan; 55(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9972816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference. Earp BD; Lewis J; Dranseika V; Hannikainen IR Theor Med Bioeth; 2021 Aug; 42(3-4):91-111. PubMed ID: 34787789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Soul searching: a brief history of the mind/body debate in the neurosciences. Dolan B Neurosurg Focus; 2007; 23(1):E2. PubMed ID: 17961052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How does the neuroscience of decision making bear on our understanding of moral responsibility and free will? Roskies AL Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 22717529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]