These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37539381)
41. Theological ethics, moral philosophy, and public moral discourse. Jonsen AR Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Mar; 4(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11645252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In defence of the middle ground. Dawson PJ J Adv Nurs; 1994 May; 19(5):1015-23. PubMed ID: 8056907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Truth and consequences. Mitchell P; Cribb A; Entwistle V Metaphilosophy; 2023 Jul; 54(4):523-538. PubMed ID: 38230408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The significance of neuroscience for philosophy. Churchland PS; Phil B Funct Neurol; 2008; 23(4):175-8. PubMed ID: 19331779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. In defense of free will: Neuroscience and criminal responsibility. Nestor PG Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101344. PubMed ID: 29685647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The role of philosophy in the contemporary abortion debate. Kortiansky P Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 15675038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bioethics and Moral Agency: On Autonomy and Moral Responsibility. Skalko J; Cherry MJ J Med Philos; 2016 Oct; 41(5):435-43. PubMed ID: 27473410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Philosophical inquiry in nursing: an argument for radical empiricism as a philosophical framework for the phenomenology of addiction. Gray MT Qual Health Res; 2004 Oct; 14(8):1151-64. PubMed ID: 15359049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. On the pursuitworthiness of qualitative methods in empirical philosophy of science. Hangel N; ChoGlueck C Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2023 Apr; 98():29-39. PubMed ID: 36842291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Forms of explanation and understanding for neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Thompson JAF J Neurophysiol; 2021 Dec; 126(6):1860-1874. PubMed ID: 34644128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement. Cross B Bioethics; 2016 Mar; 30(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 26104240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Compassion, ethics, and neuroscience: neuroethics through Buddhist eyes. Tsomo KL Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Sep; 18(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 22618161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The historical and philosophical roots of emergentism in the neurosciences. Baumeister A J Hist Neurosci; 2024; 33(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 37682692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? Beauchamp TL J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):209-17, 190. PubMed ID: 15301185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of brain lesions on moral agency: ethical dilemmas in investigating moral behavior. Christen M; Müller S Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2015; 19():159-88. PubMed ID: 25120025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals. Ishida S; Nishitsutsumi Y; Kashioka H; Taguchi T; Shineha R Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1160611. PubMed ID: 37781239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]