These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37540470)

  • 1. Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach.
    van Aert RCM; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1994-2012. PubMed ID: 37540470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multivariate meta-analysis approach for reducing the impact of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews.
    Kirkham JJ; Riley RD; Williamson PR
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2179-95. PubMed ID: 22532016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model-based correction for outcome reporting bias in meta-analysis.
    Copas J; Dwan K; Kirkham J; Williamson P
    Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):370-83. PubMed ID: 24215031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivariate meta-analysis helps examine the impact of outcome reporting bias in Cochrane rheumatoid arthritis reviews.
    Frosi G; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 25537265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial.
    Dwan K; Gamble C; Kolamunnage-Dona R; Mohammed S; Powell C; Williamson PR
    Trials; 2010 May; 11():52. PubMed ID: 20462436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariate network meta-analysis to mitigate the effects of outcome reporting bias.
    Hwang H; DeSantis SM
    Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(22):3254-3266. PubMed ID: 29882392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.
    Hempel S; Miles JN; Booth MJ; Wang Z; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():107. PubMed ID: 24286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bias correction method in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with no adjustments for zero-inflated outcomes.
    Zhou Z; Xie M; Huh D; Mun EY
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5894-5909. PubMed ID: 34476827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Shah K; Egan G; Huan LN; Kirkham J; Reid E; Tejani AM
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e032497. PubMed ID: 32184303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding Common Ground in Meta-Analysis "Wars" on Violent Video Games.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(4):705-708. PubMed ID: 31188714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis for correlated outcomes subject to reporting bias.
    Liu Y; DeSantis SM; Chen Y
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2018 Jan; 67(1):127-144. PubMed ID: 29540936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomedical journals lack a consistent method to detect outcome reporting bias: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Huan LN; Tejani AM; Egan G
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Oct; 39(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 24828874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Du H; Liu F; Wang L
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches to Assessing and Adjusting for Selective Outcome Reporting in Meta-analysis.
    Jackson JL; Balk EM; Hyun N; Kuriyama A
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Apr; 37(5):1247-1253. PubMed ID: 34669145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.