These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37541028)
21. Working memory modulates the perception of time. Pan Y; Luo QY Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 22124848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory. Pertzov Y; Manohar S; Husain M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):528-536. PubMed ID: 27668485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ventral fronto-parietal contributions to the disruption of visual working memory storage. Hakun JG; Ravizza SM Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):783-793. PubMed ID: 26436710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Decoding of Working Memory Contents in Auditory Cortex Is Not Distractor-Resistant. Deutsch P; Czoschke S; Fischer C; Kaiser J; Bledowski C J Neurosci; 2023 May; 43(18):3284-3293. PubMed ID: 36944488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better? Rajsic J; Woodman GF Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance. van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template. Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perceptual comparisons modulate memory biases induced by new visual inputs. Saito JM; Kolisnyk M; Fukuda K Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Feb; 30(1):291-302. PubMed ID: 36068372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions. Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Brady TF; Serences JT J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2300-2323. PubMed ID: 35191726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations. Marini F; Scott J; Aron AR; Ester EF Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28439791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance. Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner. Foerster RM; Schneider WX Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention. King MJ; Macnamara BN Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10504. PubMed ID: 32601295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception. Han SW Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory. Koshino H Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. de Fockert JW; Rees G; Frith CD; Lavie N Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1803-6. PubMed ID: 11230699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]