These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3754130)

  • 1. Background illumination and automated perimetry.
    Klewin KM; Radius RL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):395-7. PubMed ID: 3754130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of decreased retinal illumination on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 108(6):643-50. PubMed ID: 2596543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The influence of target blurring and simulated opacity of the ocular media on automated perimetric thresholds].
    Uyama K; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Otori T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Aug; 97(8):994-1001. PubMed ID: 8368190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold.
    Midena E; Radin PP; Convento E; Cavarzeran F
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17294384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
    Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
    Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results.
    Johnson CA; Brandt JD; Khong AM; Adams AJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 113(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 7826296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Ballon BJ; Echelman DA; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 110(12):1730-2. PubMed ID: 1463413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid test.
    Fink W; Sadun AA
    J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 14715067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.
    Dengler-Harles M; Wild JM; Cole MD; O'Neill EC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 231(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 8339949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds.
    Weinreb RN; Perlman JP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Jun; 101(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 3717255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Threshold variation in automated perimetry.
    Stewart WC; Hunt HH
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1993; 37(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 8484168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.
    Kosoko O; Sommer A; Auer C
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 3954641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients.
    Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Weinreb RN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Sep; 115(9):1129-33. PubMed ID: 9298053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.
    Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.