These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37542145)
1. Graded prioritisation of targets in search: reward diminishes the low prevalence effect. Hadjipanayi V; Ludwig CJH; Kent C Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Aug; 8(1):52. PubMed ID: 37542145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reward delays quitting in visual search. Kang G; Luo X; Chen L; Chen J; Chen J; Dai H; Zhou X Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):404-416. PubMed ID: 37498337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Van Wert MJ; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 19304645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Fleck MS; Mitroff SR Psychol Sci; 2007 Nov; 18(11):943-7. PubMed ID: 17958706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of Relative Prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening. Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Cave KR; Helman S; Way RL; Donnelly N Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20129597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More is better: Relative prevalence of multiple targets affects search accuracy. Cheng PX; Rich AN J Vis; 2018 Apr; 18(4):2. PubMed ID: 29614156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The persistence of value-driven attention capture is task-dependent. Milner AE; MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):315-341. PubMed ID: 36609677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reward history modulates attention based on feature relationship. Chen Y; Chen S; Zhang X; Zhang S; Jia K; Anderson BA; Gong M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jul; 152(7):1937-1950. PubMed ID: 36821341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Manifestation of Incidental Findings in Different Experimental Visual Search Paradigms. Rubtsova OS; Gorbunova ES Psychol Russ; 2022; 15(4):140-158. PubMed ID: 36761717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Van Wert MJ; Kenner NM; Place SS; Kibbi N J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Nov; 136(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 17999575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reward learning biases the direction of saccades. Liao MR; Anderson BA Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104145. PubMed ID: 31770659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection. Bachman MD; Wang L; Gamble ML; Woldorff MG J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(28):5455-5464. PubMed ID: 32471878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do magnitude and frequency of monetary reward guide visual search? Won BY; Leber AB Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 27270595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of being videotaped on the prevalence effect during visual search. Miyazaki Y Front Psychol; 2015; 6():583. PubMed ID: 25999895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]