These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37542556)

  • 1. Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial.
    Eichinger M; Ploner M; Degenhart G; Rudisch A; Smekal V; Attal R; Mayr R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Nov; 143(11):6707-6718. PubMed ID: 37542556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.
    Mayr R; Smekal V; Koidl C; Coppola C; Eichinger M; Rudisch A; Kranewitter C; Attal R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Apr; 28(4):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 31372680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with aperture screw fixation or all-inside reconstruction with suspensory cortical button fixation: Volumetric measurements on CT and MRI scans.
    Mayr R; Smekal V; Koidl C; Coppola C; Fritz J; Rudisch A; Kranewitter C; Attal R
    Knee; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 28705571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fu CW; Chen WC; Lu YC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jul; 21(1):445. PubMed ID: 32635920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Lee TJ; Jang KM; Kim TJ; Lee SM; Bae JH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.
    Monaco E; Fabbri M; Redler A; Gaj E; De Carli A; Argento G; Saithna A; Ferretti A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Aug; 27(8):2577-2584. PubMed ID: 30406408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PEEK Interference Screws Show Significant Tunnel Enlargement After ACL Reconstruction and is Comparable to Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Button Fixation.
    Coppola C; Krost S; Runer A; Raas C; Glodny B; Mayr R
    Indian J Orthop; 2024 Jan; 58(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 38161404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Full Tibial Tunnel: Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw and Staple Fixation.
    Mahirogullari M; Kehribar L; Surucu S; Kayaalp ME; Yilmaz AK; Aydin M
    J Knee Surg; 2023 Aug; 36(10):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 35820431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical Suspensory Button Versus Aperture Interference Screw Fixation for Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft-Tissue Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Lubowitz JH; Schwartzberg R; Smith P
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1733-9. PubMed ID: 25911394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.
    Boutsiadis A; Panisset JC; Devitt BM; Mauris F; Barthelemy R; Barth J
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Aug; 46(10):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 30015501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.
    Ma CB; Francis K; Towers J; Irrgang J; Fu FH; Harner CH
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Feb; 20(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 14760343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No Difference in Outcomes Between Suspensory (Fixed-Loop Cortical Button) Versus Expandable Anteromedial Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Tendons: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study in Male Patients.
    Panagopoulos A; Mylonas D; Kouzelis A; Zampakis P; Kraniotis P; Lakoumentas J; Gliatis J
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2021 Aug; 3(4):e1155-e1163. PubMed ID: 34430896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of ACL reconstruction with tibial Retroscrew fixation: Comparison of clinical outcomes and tibial tunnel widening.
    Cohen SB; Pandarinath R; O'Hagan T; Marchetto PA; Hyatt A; Wascher J; Deluca PF
    Phys Sportsmed; 2015 May; 43(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 25656278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction.
    Flury A; Wild L; Waltenspül M; Zindel C; Vlachopoulos L; Imhoff FB; Fucentese SF
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Apr; 143(4):1923-1930. PubMed ID: 35287180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome Between Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Cortical Button-Post Fixation in Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Study With a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.
    Chiang ER; Chen KH; Chih-Chang Lin A; Wang ST; Wu HT; Ma HL; Chang MC; Liu CL; Chen TH
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Feb; 35(2):544-551. PubMed ID: 30712629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjustable suspension versus hybrid fixation in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Putnis SE; Oshima T; Klasan A; Grasso S; Fritsch BA; Coolican MRJ; Parker DA
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():1-8. PubMed ID: 33278738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Cross-Pin Versus Cortical Button Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings Autograft: A Long-Term Clinical Study and Review of the Literature.
    Chalidis B; Pitsilos C; Pavlopoulos C; Papadopoulos P; Gigis I; Papadopoulos P
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57928. PubMed ID: 38725740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Saccomanno MF; Shin JJ; Mascarenhas R; Haro M; Verma NN; Cole BJ; Bach BR
    Arthroscopy; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1491-8. PubMed ID: 25064753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-Year Follow-up.
    Arama Y; Salmon LJ; Sri-Ram K; Linklater J; Roe JP; Pinczewski LA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):1893-901. PubMed ID: 26109611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eccentrically widened bone tunnels after all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a computed tomography and three-dimensional model-based analysis.
    Liu D; Cai ZJ; Lu WH; Pan LY; Yang YT; Li YS; Xiao WF
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Jun; 31(6):2374-2385. PubMed ID: 36138208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.