150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37543971)
21. Retrograde intrarenal surgery using the single - use flexible ureteroscope Uscope 3022 (Pusen™): evaluation of clinical results.
Salvadó JA; Olivares R; Cabello JM; Cabello R; Moreno S; Pfeifer J; Román C; Velasco A
Cent European J Urol; 2018; 71(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30038811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro comparison of simulated intrapelvic pressure in an artificial kidney model during retrograde intrarenal surgery among various single-use ureteroscopes.
Yamashita S; Tanioku T; Deguchi R; Iwahashi Y; Higuchi M; Maruyama Y; Inoue T; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Kawamata T; Hara I
Int J Urol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 37888949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An in vitro Comparative Assessment of Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes Using a Standardized Ureteroscopy Training Model.
So WZ; Gauhar V; Chen K; Lu J; Chua WJ; Tiong HY
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 35709703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study.
Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Andreassen KH; Knoll T; Osther PJ; Scoffone C; Pérez-Fentes D; Proietti S; Wiseman O; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):809-818. PubMed ID: 27671898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an
Dragos LB; Somani BK; Keller EX; De Coninck VMJ; Herrero MR; Kamphuis GM; Bres-Niewada E; Sener ET; Doizi S; Wiseman OJ; Traxer O
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S359-S370. PubMed ID: 31656742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones.
Geavlete B; Cozma C; Geavlete P
J Med Life; 2021; 14(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 34621370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study.
Salvadó JA; Cabello JM; Moreno S; Cabello R; Olivares R; Velasco A
Cent European J Urol; 2019; 72(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 31720031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical Comparison between Three Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope Models: A Real-World Experience.
Salvadó JA; Elorrieta V; Cabello JM; Cabello R; Velasco A
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 36318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Browne C; Bhatt NR; Manecksha RP; D'Arcy FT; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29177820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Single-Use Versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Qi S; Yang E; Bao J; Yang N; Guo H; Wang G; Li N; Cui X; Gao W; Ou T; Wang J; Wang Z; Niu Y
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 31432716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The new digital flexible ureteroscopes: 'size does matter'--increased ureteric access sheath use!
Bach C; Nesar S; Kumar P; Goyal A; Kachrilas S; Papatsoris A; Masood J; Buchholz N
Urol Int; 2012; 89(4):408-11. PubMed ID: 22964494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
