BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37544409)

  • 1. Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter?
    Mylrea-Foley B; Napolitano R; Gordijn S; Wolf H; Lees CC; Stampalija T;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101117. PubMed ID: 37544409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction.
    Mascherpa M; Pegoire C; Meroni A; Minopoli M; Thilaganathan B; Frick A; Bhide A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 63(5):605-612. PubMed ID: 38145554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome.
    Wolf H; Stampalija T; Lees CC;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):705-715. PubMed ID: 33599336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach.
    Lees CC; Romero R; Stampalija T; Dall'Asta A; DeVore GA; Prefumo F; Frusca T; Visser GHA; Hobbins JC; Baschat AA; Bilardo CM; Galan HL; Campbell S; Maulik D; Figueras F; Lee W; Unterscheider J; Valensise H; Da Silva Costa F; Salomon LJ; Poon LC; Ferrazzi E; Mari G; Rizzo G; Kingdom JC; Kiserud T; Hecher K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 226(3):366-378. PubMed ID: 35026129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced fetal growth velocity and weight loss are associated with adverse perinatal outcome in fetuses at risk of growth restriction.
    Stampalija T; Wolf H; Mylrea-Foley B; Marlow N; Stephens KJ; Shaw CJ; Lees CC;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):71.e1-71.e10. PubMed ID: 35752304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
    Leon-Martinez D; Lundsberg LS; Culhane J; Zhang J; Son M; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal prospective cohort study of the INTERGROWTH-21
    Drukker L; Staines-Urias E; Villar J; Barros FC; Carvalho M; Munim S; McGready R; Nosten F; Berkley JA; Norris SA; Uauy R; Kennedy SH; Papageorghiou AT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):602.e1-602.e15. PubMed ID: 31954701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
    Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS
    BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of the INTERGROWTH-21st chart compared to customized growth charts in fetuses with left heart obstruction: late trimester biometry, cerebroplacental hemodynamics and perinatal outcome.
    Graupner O; Helfrich F; Ostermayer E; Lobmaier SM; Ortiz JU; Ewert P; Wacker-Gussmann A; Haller B; Axt-Fliedner R; Enzensberger C; Abel K; Karge A; Oberhoffer R; Kuschel B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):601-613. PubMed ID: 31139902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index.
    Gardosi J; Hugh O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):547.e1-547.e13. PubMed ID: 37247647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with "small" fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction.
    Powel JE; Chavan NR; Zantow EW; Bialko MF; Farley LG; McCormick KM; Tomlinson TM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):447.e1-447.e13. PubMed ID: 37767605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive ability of fetal growth charts in identifying kindergarten-age developmental challenges: a cohort study.
    Fernandez A; Liauw J; Mayer C; Albert A; Hutcheon JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jan; 6(1):101220. PubMed ID: 37944667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012).
    ; Martins JG; Biggio JR; Abuhamad A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):B2-B17. PubMed ID: 32407785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study.
    Stampalija T; Thornton J; Marlow N; Napolitano R; Bhide A; Pickles T; Bilardo CM; Gordijn SJ; Gyselaers W; Valensise H; Hecher K; Sande RK; Lindgren P; Bergman E; Arabin B; Breeze AC; Wee L; Ganzevoort W; Richter J; Berger A; Brodszki J; Derks J; Mecacci F; Maruotti GM; Myklestad K; Lobmaier SM; Prefumo F; Klaritsch P; Calda P; Ebbing C; Frusca T; Raio L; Visser GHA; Krofta L; Cetin I; Ferrazzi E; Cesari E; Wolf H; Lees CC;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 56(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 32557921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using ultrasound and angiogenic markers from a 19- to 23-week assessment to inform the subsequent diagnosis of preeclampsia.
    Lai J; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH; von Dadelszen P; Magee LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):294.e1-294.e11. PubMed ID: 35276067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of normalization of cerebro-placental ratio as a potential predictor for adverse outcome in SGA fetuses.
    Monteith C; Flood K; Mullers S; Unterscheider J; Breathnach F; Daly S; Geary MP; Kennelly MM; McAuliffe FM; O'Donoghue K; Hunter A; Morrison JJ; Burke G; Dicker P; Tully EC; Malone FD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):285.e1-285.e6. PubMed ID: 27840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.