These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3754550)

  • 41. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses.
    Ball LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):107-30. PubMed ID: 7187432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [An experimental study on the auditory brainstem response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea].
    Saito H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Jan; 93(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 2319389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cochlear prostheses: stimulation-induced damage.
    Miller JM; Duckert LG; Malone MA; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(6 Pt 1):599-609. PubMed ID: 6689259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Physiologic measures of electrically evoked auditory system responsiveness: effects of pathology and electrical stimulation.
    Miller JM
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():28-36; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. II. Wave latencies.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):725-44. PubMed ID: 3007595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response by direct electrical stimulation to the cochlear nerve in acoustic neuroma patients.
    Tanaka H; Komatsuzaki A; Okuno H
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1997; 59(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 9166874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Characterization of wave I of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):35-44. PubMed ID: 8226348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Electrophysiologic evaluation of the cochlear implant patient.
    Stypulkowski PH; van den Honert C; Kvistad SD
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 3754948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Middle-latency responses. II. Variation among stimulation sites.
    Burton MJ; Miller JM; Kileny PR
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Apr; 115(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 2923689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. E-ABR in Patients with Cochlear Implant: A Comparison between Patients with Malformed Cochlea and Normal Cochlea.
    Di Stadio A; Dipietro L; Lucia A; Trabalzini F; Ricci G; Martines F; Pastore V; della Volpe A
    J Int Adv Otol; 2019 Aug; 15(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 31418713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development of brainstem-evoked responses in congenital auditory deprivation.
    Tillein J; Heid S; Lang E; Hartmann R; Kral A
    Neural Plast; 2012; 2012():182767. PubMed ID: 22792488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Electrically evoked brainstem responses in cochlear implant recipients.
    Miyamoto RT; Brown DD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Jan; 96(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 3118294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electrophysiological studies of the auditory system.
    Thornton AR
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 1252188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Experimental analyses of the source of ABR wave II.
    Tait C; Miller J; Cycowicz Y; Sohmer H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 244(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 3619753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Long term electrophysiological and histological results.
    Simmons FB
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(4 Pt 1):533-9. PubMed ID: 475252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response-based evaluation of the spatial distribution of auditory neuronal tissue in common cavity deformities.
    Yamazaki H; Naito Y; Fujiwara K; Moroto S; Yamamoto R; Yamazaki T; Sasaki I
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1394-402. PubMed ID: 24770408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wei CG; Wang Y; Li H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Postnatal development of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in the unanesthetized gerbil.
    Smith DI; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 1987; 27(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 3610844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects.
    Miyamoto RT
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Feb; 96(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 3753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Passive stimulation and behavioral training differentially transform temporal processing in the inferior colliculus and primary auditory cortex.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Schreiner CE; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 27733594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.