These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37546999)
1. Calibrated prediction intervals for polygenic scores across diverse contexts. Hou K; Xu Z; Ding Y; Harpak A; Pasaniuc B medRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37546999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibrated prediction intervals for polygenic scores across diverse contexts. Hou K; Xu Z; Ding Y; Mandla R; Shi Z; Boulier K; Harpak A; Pasaniuc B Nat Genet; 2024 Jul; 56(7):1386-1396. PubMed ID: 38886587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal strategies for learning multi-ancestry polygenic scores vary across traits. Lehmann B; Mackintosh M; McVean G; Holmes C Nat Commun; 2023 Jul; 14(1):4023. PubMed ID: 37419925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group. Mostafavi H; Harpak A; Agarwal I; Conley D; Pritchard JK; Przeworski M Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31999256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks shows larger variation between biobanks than methods and finds benefits of ensemble learning. Monti R; Eick L; Hudjashov G; Läll K; Kanoni S; Wolford BN; Wingfield B; Pain O; Wharrie S; Jermy B; McMahon A; Hartonen T; Heyne H; Mars N; Lambert S; ; Hveem K; Inouye M; van Heel DA; Mägi R; Marttinen P; Ripatti S; Ganna A; Lippert C Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Jul; 111(7):1431-1447. PubMed ID: 38908374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All of Us diversity and scale improve polygenic prediction contextually with greatest improvements for under-represented populations. Tsuo K; Shi Z; Ge T; Mandla R; Hou K; Ding Y; Pasaniuc B; Wang Y; Martin AR bioRxiv; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39149254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort. Privé F; Aschard H; Carmi S; Folkersen L; Hoggart C; O'Reilly PF; Vilhjálmsson BJ Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jan; 109(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 34995502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power of inclusion: Enhancing polygenic prediction with admixed individuals. Tanigawa Y; Kellis M Am J Hum Genet; 2023 Nov; 110(11):1888-1902. PubMed ID: 37890495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. mtPGS: Leverage multiple correlated traits for accurate polygenic score construction. Xu C; Ganesh SK; Zhou X Am J Hum Genet; 2023 Oct; 110(10):1673-1689. PubMed ID: 37716346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic determinants of polygenic prediction accuracy within a population. Lu T; Forgetta V; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT Genetics; 2022 Nov; 222(4):. PubMed ID: 36250789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic Association and Transferability for Urinary Albumin-Creatinine Ratio as a Marker of Kidney Disease in four Sub-Saharan African Populations and non-continental Individuals of African Ancestry. Brandenburg JT; Chen WC; Boua PR; Govender MA; Agongo G; Micklesfield LK; Sorgho H; Tollman S; Asiki G; Mashinya F; Hazelhurst S; Morris AP; Fabian J; Ramsay M medRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38293229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PGS-server: accuracy, robustness and transferability of polygenic score methods for biobank scale studies. Yang S; Zhou X Brief Bioinform; 2022 Mar; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35193147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating Disorder Probability Based on Polygenic Prediction Using the BPC Approach. Uffelmann E; ; ; Price AL; Posthuma D; Peyrot WJ medRxiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38260678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting Complex Traits and Exposures From Polygenic Scores and Blood and Buccal DNA Methylation Profiles. Odintsova VV; Rebattu V; Hagenbeek FA; Pool R; Beck JJ; Ehli EA; van Beijsterveldt CEM; Ligthart L; Willemsen G; de Geus EJC; Hottenga JJ; Boomsma DI; van Dongen J Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():688464. PubMed ID: 34393852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of methods for building polygenic scores for diverse populations. Gunn S; Wang X; Posner DC; Cho K; Huffman JE; Gaziano M; Wilson PW; Sun YV; Peloso G; Lunetta KL HGG Adv; 2024 Sep; 6(1):100355. PubMed ID: 39323095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning optimized polygenic scores for blood cell traits identify sex-specific trajectories and genetic correlations with disease. Xu Y; Vuckovic D; Ritchie SC; Akbari P; Jiang T; Grealey J; Butterworth AS; Ouwehand WH; Roberts DJ; Di Angelantonio E; Danesh J; Soranzo N; Inouye M Cell Genom; 2022 Jan; 2(1):None. PubMed ID: 35072137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genotype error due to low-coverage sequencing induces uncertainty in polygenic scoring. Petter E; Ding Y; Hou K; Bhattacharya A; Gusev A; Zaitlen N; Pasaniuc B Am J Hum Genet; 2023 Aug; 110(8):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 37490908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three Open Questions in Polygenic Score Portability. Wang JY; Lin N; Zietz M; Mares J; Narasimhan VM; Rathouz PJ; Harpak A bioRxiv; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39229140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trait imputation enhances nonlinear genetic prediction for some traits. He R; Fu J; Ren J; Pan W Genetics; 2024 Nov; 228(3):. PubMed ID: 39255064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]