BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37547328)

  • 1. First-line tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy
    Liu W; Huo G; Chen P
    Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1163381. PubMed ID: 37547328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study.
    Johnson ML; Cho BC; Luft A; Alatorre-Alexander J; Geater SL; Laktionov K; Kim SW; Ursol G; Hussein M; Lim FL; Yang CT; Araujo LH; Saito H; Reinmuth N; Shi X; Poole L; Peters S; Garon EB; Mok T;
    J Clin Oncol; 2023 Feb; 41(6):1213-1227. PubMed ID: 36327426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus etoposide: platinum in the first-line therapy of extensive stage small-cell lung cancer from the Chinese payers' perspective.
    Tong YH; Ding HY; Xin WX; Zhong LK; Xu GQ; Zhang B; Yang GN; Fang L
    Tumori; 2022 Feb; 108(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 33511911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Durvalumab in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Kareff SA; Han S; Haaland B; Jani CJ; Kohli R; Aguiar PN; Huang Y; Soo RA; Rodríguez-Perez Á; García-Foncillas J; Dómine M; de Lima Lopes G
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413938. PubMed ID: 38814640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First-Line Durvalumab in Addition to Etoposide and Platinum for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A U.S.-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Lin S; Luo S; Gu D; Li M; Rao X; Wang C; Huang P; Xu X; Weng X
    Oncologist; 2021 Nov; 26(11):e2013-e2020. PubMed ID: 34431578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Durvalumab vs placebo consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated PACIFIC trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Han J; Tian K; Yang J; Gong Y
    Lung Cancer; 2020 Aug; 146():42-49. PubMed ID: 32512272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Huo G; Liu W; Kang S; Chen P
    Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1131219. PubMed ID: 36865925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab vs Standard Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The MYSTIC Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Rizvi NA; Cho BC; Reinmuth N; Lee KH; Luft A; Ahn MJ; van den Heuvel MM; Cobo M; Vicente D; Smolin A; Moiseyenko V; Antonia SJ; Le Moulec S; Robinet G; Natale R; Schneider J; Shepherd FA; Geater SL; Garon EB; Kim ES; Goldberg SB; Nakagawa K; Raja R; Higgs BW; Boothman AM; Zhao L; Scheuring U; Stockman PK; Chand VK; Peters S;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 May; 6(5):661-674. PubMed ID: 32271377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First-line treatment with durvalumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Zheng Z; Fang L; Cai H
    BMJ Open; 2023 Dec; 13(12):e076383. PubMed ID: 38101853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NEPTUNE: Phase 3 Study of First-Line Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC.
    de Castro G; Rizvi NA; Schmid P; Syrigos K; Martin C; Yamamoto N; Cheng Y; Moiseyenko V; Summers Y; Vynnychenko I; Lee SY; Bryl M; Zer A; Erman M; Timcheva C; Raja R; Naicker K; Scheuring U; Walker J; Mann H; Chand V; Mok T;
    J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Jan; 18(1):106-119. PubMed ID: 36240972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer based on the TOPAZ-1 trial.
    Zhao Q; Xie R; Zhong W; Liu W; Chen T; Qiu X; Yang L
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):19. PubMed ID: 36859267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.
    Fox M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Dean J; Stein K; Price A; Taylor RS
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. PubMed ID: 17999842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
    Meng M; Liu X; Liang X; Chen X; Li Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Apr; 103(16):e37836. PubMed ID: 38640325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy Versus No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
    Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Grossi F; Costa F
    Clin Ther; 2020 May; 42(5):830-847. PubMed ID: 32354495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding ramucirumab to the first-line erlotinib treatment for untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China.
    Liu Q; Luo X; Peng L; Yi L; Wan X; Zeng X; Tan C
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e040691. PubMed ID: 33243806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ARCTIC: durvalumab with or without tremelimumab as third-line or later treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Planchard D; Reinmuth N; Orlov S; Fischer JR; Sugawara S; Mandziuk S; Marquez-Medina D; Novello S; Takeda Y; Soo R; Park K; McCleod M; Geater SL; Powell M; May R; Scheuring U; Stockman P; Kowalski D
    Ann Oncol; 2020 May; 31(5):609-618. PubMed ID: 32201234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Main C; Bojke L; Griffin S; Norman G; Barbieri M; Mather L; Stark D; Palmer S; Riemsma R
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(9):1-132. iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
    Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
    Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness of Ribociclib plus Letrozole Versus Palbociclib plus Letrozole and Letrozole Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A U.S. Payer Perspective.
    Mistry R; May JR; Suri G; Young K; Brixner D; Oderda G; Biskupiak J; Tang D; Bhattacharyya S; Mishra D; Bhattacharyya D; Dalal AA
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jun; 24(6):514-523. PubMed ID: 29799329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.