155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37547571)
1. Comparison of In-House Microfluidic Device and Centrifuge-Based Method Efficacy in Sperm Preparation for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Phairatana T; Prateepchaikul T; Navakanittworakul R; Choksuchat C
J Reprod Infertil; 2023; 24(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 37547571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.
Quinn MM; Jalalian L; Ribeiro S; Ona K; Demirci U; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 30007319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Live motile sperm sorting device for enhanced sperm-fertilization competency: comparative analysis with density-gradient centrifugation and microfluidic sperm sorting.
Hsu CT; Lee CI; Lin FS; Wang FZ; Chang HC; Wang TE; Huang CC; Tsao HM; Lee MS; Agarwal A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Aug; 40(8):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 37300647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) measurements in couples with male factor infertility undergoing ICSI.
Wang M; Sun J; Wang L; Gao X; Lu X; Wu Z; Wang Y; Liu K; Tao J; Wu Y
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Dec; 31(12):1655-63. PubMed ID: 25227693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient isolation of sperm with high DNA integrity and stable chromatin packaging by a combination of density-gradient centrifugation and magnetic-activated cell sorting.
Chi HJ; Kwak SJ; Kim SG; Kim YY; Park JY; Yoo CS; Park IH; Sun HG; Kim JW; Lee KH
Clin Exp Reprod Med; 2016 Dec; 43(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 28090458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation.
Le MT; Dang HNT; Nguyen TV; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen QHV; Cao NT
J Int Med Res; 2022 May; 50(5):3000605221097492. PubMed ID: 35545843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation in improving sperm deformity rate and DNA fragmentation index in semen samples from teratozoospermic patients.
Xue X; Wang WS; Shi JZ; Zhang SL; Zhao WQ; Shi WH; Guo BZ; Qin Z
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Sep; 31(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 25015033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Modified Flotation Density Gradient Centrifugation Technique Improves the Semen Quality of Stallions with a High DNA Fragmentation Index.
Umair M; Henning H; Stout TAE; Claes A
Animals (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimized sperm selection: a highly efficient device for the isolation of progressive motile sperm with low DNA fragmentation index.
Mateizel I; Racca A; Aligianni E; Distasi E; Baert Y; Segers I; Jankovic D; Schoemans C; Wouters K; Tournaye H; De Munck N
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38890266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MACS-DGC sperm preparation method resulted in high-quality sperm, top-quality embryo, and higher blastocyst rate in male factor infertile couples with high DNA fragmented sperm.
Salehi Novin M; Mehdizadeh A; Artimani T; Bakhtiari M; Mehdizadeh M; Aflatoonian R; Zandieh Z
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(6):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 37469268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA fragmentation in human sperm after magnetic-activated cell sorting.
Bucar S; Gonçalves A; Rocha E; Barros A; Sousa M; Sá R
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Jan; 32(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 25374393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sperm enrichment from poor semen samples by double density gradient centrifugation in combination with swim-up for IVF cycles.
Dai X; Wang Y; Cao F; Yu C; Gao T; Xia X; Wu J; Chen L
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2286. PubMed ID: 32042061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and Zeta method may improve ICSI outcome.
Kheirollahi-Kouhestani M; Razavi S; Tavalaee M; Deemeh MR; Mardani M; Moshtaghian J; Nasr-Esfahani MH
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2409-16. PubMed ID: 19553239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Separation efficiency of a microfluidic sperm sorter to minimize sperm DNA damage.
Shirota K; Yotsumoto F; Itoh H; Obama H; Hidaka N; Nakajima K; Miyamoto S
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):315-21.e1. PubMed ID: 26551440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) versus density gradient centrifugation (DGC) for the selection of human sperm in assisted reproductive techniques].
Fang L; Ye YH; Li ES; Feng GF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 98(40):3263-3267. PubMed ID: 30392293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques.
Bibi R; Jahan S; Afsar T; Almajwal A; Hammadeh ME; Amor H; Abusharha A; Razak S
Biomedicines; 2023 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 36831003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Male age: negative impact on sperm DNA fragmentation.
Albani E; Castellano S; Gurrieri B; Arruzzolo L; Negri L; Borroni EM; Levi-Setti PE
Aging (Albany NY); 2019 May; 11(9):2749-2761. PubMed ID: 31085803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure.
Zhao F; Yang Q; Shi S; Luo X; Sun Y
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39051. PubMed ID: 27958357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microfluidic chips as a method for sperm selection improve fertilization rate in couples with fertilization failure.
Mirsanei JS; Sheibak N; Zandieh Z; Mehdizadeh M; Aflatoonian R; Tabatabaei M; Mousavi AS; Amjadi F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):901-910. PubMed ID: 35650258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility.
Caliskan Z; Kucukgergin C; Aktan G; Kadioglu A; Ozdemirler G
Andrologia; 2022 Dec; 54(11):e14587. PubMed ID: 36106500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
