145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37548005)
21. Arthroscopic tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw and soft anchor: A case series of 60 patients.
Sasaki Y; Ochiai N; Kenmoku T; Yamaguchi T; Kijima T; Hashimoto E; Ohtori S
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 31153740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.
Vestermark G; Hartigan D; Piasecki D; Fleischli J; Odum SM; Zheng N; D'Alessandro DF
Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e1009-e1016. PubMed ID: 28968479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear.
Lee HI; Shon MS; Koh KH; Lim TK; Heo J; Yoo JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Mar; 23(3):e53-60. PubMed ID: 24021158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques.
Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Leong NL; Shewman EF; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Forsythe B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30948215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical comparison of the three techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation with Cobra Guide, interference screw and suture anchor.
Poberaj B; Marjanovič B; Zupančič M; Nabergoj M; Cvetko E; Balažic M; Senekovič V
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30762217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new "soft anchor" tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation.
Baleani M; Francesconi D; Zani L; Giannini S; Snyder SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 25533271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anatomic and radiographic comparison of arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis sites.
Johannsen AM; Macalena JA; Carson EW; Tompkins M
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2919-24. PubMed ID: 24057029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical Analysis of Suture Anchor vs Tenodesis Screw for FHL Transfer.
Drakos MC; Gott M; Karnovsky SC; Murphy CI; DeSandis BA; Chinitz N; Grande D; Chahine N
Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Jul; 38(7):797-801. PubMed ID: 28460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.
Lacheta L; Rosenberg SI; Brady AW; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ
Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 7(10):2325967119876276. PubMed ID: 31663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Open subpectoral vs. arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis: A comparison study of clinical outcomes.
Tu J; Xu B; Guo R
Exp Ther Med; 2020 Jan; 19(1):428-434. PubMed ID: 31853318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws.
Green JM; Getelman MH; Snyder SJ; Burns JP
Arthroscopy; 2017 Jan; 33(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 27659242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor.
Kongmalai P
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 30145670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
Richards DP; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jul; 21(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16012500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Complications after subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a dual suture anchor technique.
Abtahi AM; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
Int J Shoulder Surg; 2014 Apr; 8(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 25114415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chronic rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon: comparison of 2-year results following primary versus revision open subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
Euler SA; Horan MP; Ellman MB; Greenspoon JA; Millett PJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 May; 136(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 26810192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Staple, Anchor, and Tenodesis Screw for Posterior Tibialis Tendon Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Aslan L; Gunerbuyuk C; Gedik CC; Sarabi MR; Kilicoglu O
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(2):194-198. PubMed ID: 37935326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using All-Suture Anchor.
Gifford A; Tauro T; Haunschild E; Okoroha K; Cole BJ
Arthrosc Tech; 2020 Apr; 9(4):e445-e451. PubMed ID: 32368463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
