These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37548443)

  • 1. Social Expectations are Primarily Rooted in Reciprocity: An Investigation of Fairness, Cooperation, and Trustworthiness.
    Bogdan PC; Dolcos F; Moore M; Kuznietsov I; Culpepper SA; Dolcos S
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Aug; 47(8):e13326. PubMed ID: 37548443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game.
    Li J; Cheng N; Hou W
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 33594817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness.
    Jordan JJ; Hoffman M; Bloom P; Rand DG
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7591):473-6. PubMed ID: 26911783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From good institutions to generous citizens: Top-down incentives to cooperate promote subsequent prosociality but not norm enforcement.
    Stagnaro MN; Arechar AA; Rand DG
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():212-254. PubMed ID: 28249658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Mifune N; Hashimoto H; Li Y; Shinada M; Miura A; Inukai K; Takagishi H; Simunovic D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20364-8. PubMed ID: 23188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fairness norms and theory of mind in an ultimatum game: judgments, offers, and decisions in school-aged children.
    Castelli I; Massaro D; Bicchieri C; Chavez A; Marchetti A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105024. PubMed ID: 25118863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting behavior in economic games by looking through the eyes of the players.
    Mellers BA; Haselhuhn MP; Tetlock PE; Silva JC; Isen AM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):743-55. PubMed ID: 20853991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reciprocity and identity protection: reasons for rejection in the ultimatum game].
    Horita Y; Yamagishi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 18027592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness.
    Jordan JJ; McAuliffe K; Warneken F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111(35):12710-5. PubMed ID: 25136086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen.
    Pleasant A; Barclay P
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):868-876. PubMed ID: 29708860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motivations to reciprocate cooperation and punish defection are calibrated by estimates of how easily others can switch partners.
    Arai S; Tooby J; Cosmides L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267153. PubMed ID: 35439276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Punishing the individual or the group for norm violation.
    El Zein M; Seikus C; De-Wit L; Bahrami B
    Wellcome Open Res; 2019; 4():139. PubMed ID: 32190748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
    Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Humans expect generosity.
    Brañas-Garza P; Rodríguez-Lara I; Sánchez A
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42446. PubMed ID: 28195218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the psychology and economics of antisocial personality.
    Engelmann JB; Schmid B; De Dreu CKW; Chumbley J; Fehr E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(26):12781-12786. PubMed ID: 31186356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preschoolers' group bias in punishing selfishness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wu Z; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():280-292. PubMed ID: 28961488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gossip in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games: Its Immediate and Downstream Consequences for Cooperation.
    Wu J; Balliet D; Kou Y; Van Lange PAM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():651. PubMed ID: 30984073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The games economists play: Why economics students behave more selfishly than other students.
    Gerlach P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183814. PubMed ID: 28873465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.