121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37548500)
1. Comparison of labor duration of induced labor with dinoprostone insert vs spontaneous labor.
Skibinska KA; Kolak M; Micek A; Huras H; Jaworowski A
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(12):984-989. PubMed ID: 37548500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China.
Zhao L; Lin Y; Jiang TT; Wang L; Li M; Wang Y; Sun GQ; Xiao M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 29268652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent.
Athiel Y; Crequit S; Bongiorno M; Sanyan S; Renevier B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101834. PubMed ID: 32585393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
Yamaguchi M; Takakura S; Enomoto N; Teishikata Y; Kitamura A; Maki S; Tanaka K; Maezawa T; Tanaka H; Ikeda T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Dec; 47(12):4256-4262. PubMed ID: 34545652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of vaginal washing before intravaginal dinoprostone insertion for labor induction: A randomized clinical trial.
Yayla Abide Ç; Kurek Eken M; Ozkaya E; Yenidede I; Bostanci Ergen E; Kilicci C; Sanverdi I; Eroğlu M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2149-2155. PubMed ID: 30094885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial.
Sulaiman S; Sivaranjani S; Razali N; Lim BK; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 160(3):814-822. PubMed ID: 35869955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience.
Tseng JY; Lin IC; Chang WH; Yeh CC; Horng HC; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 59(5):723-727. PubMed ID: 32917325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor.
Bhatia A; Teo PL; Li M; Lee JYB; Chan MXJ; Yeo TW; Mathur M; Tagore S; Yeo GSH; Arulkumaran S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Sep; 47(9):3171-3178. PubMed ID: 34162016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial.
Eser A; Ozkaya E; Abide CY; Eser T; Eser GY; Abike F; Tayyar AT; Eroglu M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 30536117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements.
Ben Zvi D; Gutzeit O; Iluz R; Weissman A; Solt I; Weiner Z; Zipori Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7417-7421. PubMed ID: 34278924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Second dose of PGE
Mohr-Sasson A; Schiff E; Sindel O; Suday RR; Kalter-Farber A; Mashiach R; Yinon Y; Dulitzki M; Sivan E; Mazaki-Tovi S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2074-2077. PubMed ID: 27633399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Liu Y; Duan Y; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2382-8. PubMed ID: 26427519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I; Gaudier FL
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
