These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37548513)

  • 1. Comparison of laparoscopic pectopexy with the standard laparoscopic sacropexy for apical prolapse: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.
    Khoiwal K; Dash KC; Gaurav A; Chaturvedi J
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2023 Sep; 24(3):144-151. PubMed ID: 37548513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy-postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study.
    Noé KG; Schiermeier S; Alkatout I; Anapolski M
    J Endourol; 2015 Feb; 29(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 25350228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Quality of Life and Female Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in Apical Prolapse Patients.
    Obut M; Oğlak SC; Akgöl S
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2021; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 34040968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uterine preserving technique in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: Laparoscopic pectopexy.
    Salman S; Kumbasar S; Yeniocak AS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Mar; 48(3):850-856. PubMed ID: 35001452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Pectopexy: An Effective Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse with an Evident Improvement on Quality of Life.
    Karslı A; Karslı O; Kale A
    Prague Med Rep; 2021; 122(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 33646939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.
    Peng J; Li S; Wang L; Yang L; Nai M; Xu Q; Jin Y; Liu P; Li L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18519. PubMed ID: 37898708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a randomised comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpo-cervicopexy to the new laparoscopic pectopexy. Short-term postoperative results.
    Noé KG; Spüntrup C; Anapolski M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 22945837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic Pectopexy with Burch Colposuspension for Pelvic Prolapse Associated with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Pirtea L; Balint O; Secoșan C; Grigoraș D; Ilina R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1023-1024. PubMed ID: 31683027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery.
    Kale A; Biler A; Terzi H; Usta T; Kale E
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(5):903-909. PubMed ID: 28727377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intermediate-term outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and vaginal sacrospinous fi xation: a comparative study.
    Astepe BS; Karsli A; Köleli I; Aksakal OS; Terzi H; Kale A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(5):999-1007. PubMed ID: 31408288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective international multicenter pectopexy trial: Interim results and findings post surgery.
    Noé GK; Schiermeier S; Papathemelis T; Fuellers U; Khudyakov A; Altmann HH; Borowski S; Morawski PP; Gantert M; De Vree B; Zbigniew T; Ugarteburu RG; Anapolski M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():81-86. PubMed ID: 31765998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.
    Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified laparoscopic pectopexy: short-term follow-up and its effects on sexual function and quality of life.
    Tahaoglu AE; Bakir MS; Peker N; Bagli İ; Tayyar AT
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1155-1160. PubMed ID: 29500516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair.
    Bolovis D; Hitzl W; Brucker C
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):815-823. PubMed ID: 34498174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermediate-term follow-up of laparoscopic pectopexy cases and their effects on sexual function and quality of life: a cross-sectional study.
    Erdem S
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2022; 140(4):583-587. PubMed ID: 35674612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
    Brasoveanu S; Ilina R; Balulescu L; Pirtea M; Secosan C; Grigoraș D; Chiriac D; Bardan R; Margan MM; Alexandru A; Pirtea L
    Life (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37895333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic pectopexy with native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Yu P; Liu C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 36879174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial Experience of Laparoscopic Pectopexy for Apical Prolapse in South Korea.
    Yu EH; Jung HE; Noh HK; Joo JK
    J Menopausal Med; 2020 Dec; 26(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 33423405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature.
    Szymczak P; Grzybowska ME; Wydra DG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Nov; 38(8):2031-2050. PubMed ID: 31452267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.