These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37548527)

  • 1. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
    Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Dec; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Lumbosacral Fusion Grade in Patients after Transforaminal and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.
    Liu J; Xie R; Chin CT; Rajagopalan P; Duan PG; Li B; Burch S; Berven SH; Mummaneni PV; Chou D
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Sep; 15(9):2334-2341. PubMed ID: 37526121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ALIF Versus TLIF for L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures Domains.
    Lightsey HM; Pisano AJ; Striano BM; Crawford AM; Xiong GX; Hershman S; Schoenfeld AJ; Simpson AK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Jun; 47(11):808-816. PubMed ID: 35125462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.
    Hsieh PC; Koski TR; O'Shaughnessy BA; Sugrue P; Salehi S; Ondra S; Liu JC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Oct; 7(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17933310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative spinal alignment comparison of lateral versus supine patient position L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Khajavi K; Menezes CM; Braly BA; Thomas JA
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2248-2254. PubMed ID: 35610486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Xu DS; Bach K; Uribe JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E4. PubMed ID: 29290134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nguyen AQ; Ukogu C; Harvey JP; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Khanna K; Sheha ED; Gandhi SD; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 37148223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.
    Dorward IG; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; OʼLeary PT; Stoker GE; Pahys JM; Kang MM; Sides BA; Koester LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E755-62. PubMed ID: 23442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?
    Kim M; Kumar R; Drolet CE; Bs MA; Hanks T; Yamaguchi K; Krause K; Nemani VM; Leveque JC; Louie PK
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Sep; 33(9):3503-3508. PubMed ID: 38965087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Chen X; Wu LL; Yang ZC; Qiu YJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 37211931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Fusion Surgery in L5/S1 - What Is the Best Way to Restore a physiological Alignment?
    Platz U; Halm H; Thomsen B; Pecsi F; Köszegvary M; Bürger N; Berlin C; Quante M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2022 Dec; 160(6):646-656. PubMed ID: 34496423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.