These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37548527)

  • 21. Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Song Z; Zhang Z; Zheng J; Zhang K; Wang F; Ran M; Luo J
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4320. PubMed ID: 38383595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiographic comparison of lordotic and hyperlordotic implants in L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Farber SH; Sagar S; Godzik J; Zhou JJ; Walker CT; Khajavi K; Turner JD; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 May; 36(5):775-783. PubMed ID: 34798612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ali EMS; Abdeen M; Saleh MK
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Sep; 166(1):365. PubMed ID: 39264454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation.
    Lee Y; Heard JC; McCurdy MA; Lambrechts MJ; Fras SI; Purtill W; Millar B; Kolowrat S; Issa TZ; D'Antonio ND; Rihn JA; Kurd MF; Kaye ID; Canseco JA; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Aug; 49(15):1078-1084. PubMed ID: 37737684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.
    Khalifeh JM; Dibble CF; Stecher P; Dorward I; Hawasli AH; Ray WZ
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Oct; 19(5):518-529. PubMed ID: 32433773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical management of isthmic spondylolisthesis: A comparative study of postoperative outcomes between ALIF and TLIF.
    Prost S; Giorgi H; Ould-Slimane M; Zairi F; Collinet A; D'astorg H; Szadkowski M; Litrico S; Gennari A; Grelat M; Parent H; Fuentes S; Charles YP; Blondel B;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 109(6):103560. PubMed ID: 36702299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
    BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal and Anterolateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-grade Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Zhu L; Wang P; Zhang L; Feng X; Zhang W
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Mar; 35(2):E285-E291. PubMed ID: 34654771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis?
    Kim JS; Lee KY; Lee SH; Lee HY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 20121352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Yu Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Xu J; Chen Y; Fan X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 36708116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 using a novel implant with anterior plate fixation.
    Szadkowski M; d'Astorg H; Bouhali H; Aleksic I; Ramos-Pascual S; Fière V
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 32504869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open- and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions].
    Zhang Y; Li F; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Yu Y; Cheng L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 34(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 32291975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Nov; 30(21):e1382-e1390. PubMed ID: 36264190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The minimally invasive interbody selection algorithm for spinal deformity.
    Mummaneni PV; Hussain I; Shaffrey CI; Eastlack RK; Mundis GM; Uribe JS; Fessler RG; Park P; Robinson L; Rivera J; Chou D; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Nunley PD; Wang MY; Marca F; Than KD; Fu KM;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 May; 34(5):741-748. PubMed ID: 33711811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion verse 3D microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 24-month follow-up.
    Guo W; Li T; Feng C; Yu Y; Hu Y; Fan X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 38066527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.