BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3754920)

  • 1. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH; Zwicker E; Scherer H; Seifert J; Leysieffer H; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J; Schön F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E; Laszig R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An implant for stimulation of the acoustic nerve with 12 channels].
    Zwicker E; Leysieffer H; Dinter K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3754919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR; Ruth RA; Thomas JF
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary studies of deaf patients assessed for cochlear implantation].
    Schorn K; Seifert J; Stecker M; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 3012229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK; Dobelle WH; Brackmann DE; Mladejovsky MG; Parkin JL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21063206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
    Clark GM; Blamey PJ; Brown AM; Gusby PA; Dowell RC; Franz BK; Pyman BC; Shepherd RK; Tong YC; Webb RL
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nucleus 20-channel and 21-channel auditory brain stem implants: first European experiences.
    Laszig R; Sollmann WP; Marangos N; Charachon R; Ramsden R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():28-30. PubMed ID: 7668669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [No Hearing Sensation after cochlear implantation despite successful objective measurement outcome].
    Gärtner L; Büchner A; Joseph G; Neuburger J; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Apr; 90(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 21181621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Burian K; Fischer RE
    Med Prog Technol; 1981; 8(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 6895542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cochlear prosthesis: a review of the design and evaluation of electrode implants for the profoundly deaf.
    Spelman FA
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1982; 8(3):223-52. PubMed ID: 6754255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extracochlear sixteen-channel electrode system.
    Banfai P; Karczag A; Kubik S; Lüers P; Sürth W
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):371-408. PubMed ID: 3754953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current status of electrostimulation of auditory nerve fibers with cochlear implants].
    Burian K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1992; 142(11-12):264-73. PubMed ID: 1529619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.