These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3754921)

  • 1. The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda JL; Jackler RK
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Jun; 96(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 3754921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The UCSF/Storz cochlear implant: patient performance.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1987 May; 8(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 3307448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical considerations and hearing results with the UCSF/Storz cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Jackler RK; Merzenich MM
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jan; 97(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 3796176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of the art of cochlear implants. The UCSF experience.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1989 Mar; 10(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 2660581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):1006-13. PubMed ID: 1518346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using nonsense syllables.
    Clark GM; Tong YC; Martin LF; Busby PA; Dowell RC; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1981; 90(3 Pt 1):227-30. PubMed ID: 6895008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants.
    Dowell RC; Mecklenburg DJ; Clark GM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Oct; 112(10):1054-9. PubMed ID: 3755975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cochlear implant: a comparison of single-channel and multichannel results.
    Doyle PJ; Pijl S; Noel FJ
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Jun; 20(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 1870169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Burian K; Fischer RE
    Med Prog Technol; 1981; 8(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 6895542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear Implant Study Group.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Fisher SG
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Jan; 328(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 8418403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients.
    Shea JJ; Domico EH; Orchik DJ
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 2308444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Apr; 102(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 1556888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor in a cochlear implant program for profoundly hearing-impaired adults.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Galvin KL; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2026287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement in speech perception and production abilities in children using a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Waltzman S; Cohen NL; Spivak L; Ying E; Brackett D; Shapiro W; Hoffman R
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 2308447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Farmer JC; Lawson DT; Weber BA; Wolford RD; Kenan PD; White MW; Merzenich MM; Schindler RA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1069-77. PubMed ID: 3172953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-implant evaluation of speech and hearing.
    Abel SM; Tse SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 3682048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Martin LF; Clark GM; Brown AM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.