BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37549807)

  • 1. Differences between high and low performers in face recognition in electrophysiological correlates of face familiarity and distance-to-norm.
    Schroeger A; Ficco L; Wuttke SJ; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2023 Sep; 182():108654. PubMed ID: 37549807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The P200 predominantly reflects distance-to-norm in face space whereas the N250 reflects activation of identity-specific representations of known faces.
    Wuttke SJ; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():86-95. PubMed ID: 30529289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Leder H; Martin EM; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155380. PubMed ID: 27168323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiarity is familiarity is familiarity: Event-related brain potentials reveal qualitatively similar representations of personally familiar and famous faces.
    Wiese H; Hobden G; Siilbek E; Martignac V; Flack TR; Ritchie KL; Young AW; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1144-1164. PubMed ID: 34672660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting a viewer's familiarity with a face: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and classifier analyses.
    Wiese H; Anderson D; Beierholm U; Tüttenberg SC; Young AW; Burton AM
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jan; 59(1):e13950. PubMed ID: 34587297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time it takes to truly know someone: Neurophysiological correlates of face and identity learning during the first two years.
    Popova T; Wiese H
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108312. PubMed ID: 35288213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory stimulation modulates perceptual and post perceptual face representations: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Estudillo AJ; Kaufmann JM; Bindemann M; Schweinberger SR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 48(5):2259-2271. PubMed ID: 30107052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Later but not early stages of familiar face recognition depend strongly on attentional resources: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Ingram BT; Elley ML; Tüttenberg SC; Burton AM; Young AW
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():147-158. PubMed ID: 31310964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is your own face more than a highly familiar face?
    Alzueta E; Melcón M; Poch C; Capilla A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Mar; 142():100-107. PubMed ID: 30738092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased N250 elicited by facial familiarity: An ERP study including the face inversion effect and facial emotion processing.
    Abreu AL; Fernández-Aguilar L; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Sep; 188():108623. PubMed ID: 37356541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Robust Neural Index of High Face Familiarity.
    Wiese H; Tüttenberg SC; Ingram BT; Chan CYX; Gurbuz Z; Burton AM; Young AW
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Feb; 30(2):261-272. PubMed ID: 30557087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetition effects in human ERPs to faces.
    Schweinberger SR; Neumann MF
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():141-53. PubMed ID: 26672902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High and low performers differ in the use of shape information for face recognition.
    Kaufmann JM; Schulz C; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1310-9. PubMed ID: 23562837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing familiarity during the first eight months of knowing a person: A longitudinal EEG study on face and identity learning.
    Popova T; Wiese H
    Cortex; 2023 Aug; 165():26-37. PubMed ID: 37245406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Eimer M; Gosling A; Duchaine B
    Brain; 2012 Feb; 135(Pt 2):542-54. PubMed ID: 22271660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of anticaricaturing vs. caricaturing and their neural correlates elucidate a role of shape for face learning.
    Schulz C; Kaufmann JM; Walther L; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2426-34. PubMed ID: 22750120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.
    Hagemann J; Straube T; Schulz C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():136-49. PubMed ID: 26878979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological correlates of face-evoked person knowledge.
    Taylor J; Shehzad Z; McCarthy G
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():136-146. PubMed ID: 27241517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.