130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37549956)
21. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 19- and 22-gauge needles in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal masses and lymph nodes.
Songür N; Songür Y; Bırcan S; Kapucuoğlu N
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2011 Oct; 22(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 22234753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: a prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence.
Fabbri C; Polifemo AM; Luigiano C; Cennamo V; Baccarini P; Collina G; Fornelli A; Macchia S; Zanini N; Jovine E; Fiscaletti M; Alibrandi A; D'Imperio N
Dig Liver Dis; 2011 Aug; 43(8):647-52. PubMed ID: 21592873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective randomized trial to compare the safety, diagnostic yield and utility of 22-gauge and 19-gauge endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspirates and processing technique by cytology and histopathology.
Manley CJ; Kumar R; Gong Y; Huang M; Wei SS; Nagarathinam R; Haber A; Egleston B; Flieder D; Ehya H
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 34896033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.
Attam R; Arain MA; Bloechl SJ; Trikudanathan G; Munigala S; Bakman Y; Singh M; Wallace T; Henderson JB; Catalano MF; Guda NM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 25733127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle and fine-needle aspiration liquid-based cytology with a conventional 25-gauge needle provide comparable diagnostic accuracy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Tomita Y; Torisu Y; Chiba M; Kinoshita Y; Akasu T; Shimamoto N; Abe T; Kanazawa K; Takakura K; Tsukinaga S; Nakano M; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Saruta M
JGH Open; 2021 Sep; 5(9):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 34584980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study).
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Mukai T; Togawa O; Matsubara S; Hatano Y; Hara A; Tanaka M; Shibahara J; Fukayama M; Isayama H; Yasuda I
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Apr; 63(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29464585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can sonographic findings predict the results of liver aspirates in dogs with suspected liver disease?
Guillot M; Danjou MA; Alexander K; Bédard C; Desnoyers M; Beauregard G; Del Castillo JR
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 19788037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A prospective randomized study comparing 25-G and 22-G needles of a new platform for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid masses.
Carrara S; Anderloni A; Jovani M; Di Tommaso L; Rahal D; Hassan C; Ridola L; Federico D; Loriga A; Repici A
Dig Liver Dis; 2016 Jan; 48(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 26607829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
