BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37550470)

  • 1. PyBEAM: A Bayesian approach to parameter inference for a wide class of binary evidence accumulation models.
    Murrow M; Holmes WR
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2636-2656. PubMed ID: 37550470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic models of choice.
    Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks.
    Evans NJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1070-1098. PubMed ID: 30783896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian analysis of the piecewise diffusion decision model.
    Holmes WR; Trueblood JS
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):730-743. PubMed ID: 28597236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data.
    Feltgen Q; Daunizeau J
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():531316. PubMed ID: 33898982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making.
    Evans NJ; Trueblood JS; Holmes WR
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):193-206. PubMed ID: 30924107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
    Peters J; D'Esposito M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new model of decision processing in instrumental learning tasks.
    Miletić S; Boag RJ; Trutti AC; Stevenson N; Forstmann BU; Heathcote A
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33501916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayes factors for the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making.
    Evans NJ; Brown SD
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):589-603. PubMed ID: 28455795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood approximation networks (LANs) for fast inference of simulation models in cognitive neuroscience.
    Fengler A; Govindarajan LN; Chen T; Frank MJ
    Elife; 2021 Apr; 10():. PubMed ID: 33821788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Parameter Reviews in Cognitive Modeling: Towards a Robust and Cumulative Characterization of Psychological Processes in the Diffusion Decision Model.
    Tran NH; van Maanen L; Heathcote A; Matzke D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():608287. PubMed ID: 33584443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.
    Brodersen KH; Penny WD; Harrison LM; Daunizeau J; Ruff CC; Duzel E; Friston KJ; Stephan KE
    Neural Netw; 2008 Nov; 21(9):1247-60. PubMed ID: 18835129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Seven-parameter Diffusion Model: an Implementation in Stan for Bayesian Analyses.
    Henrich F; Hartmann R; Pratz V; Voss A; Klauer KC
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3102-3116. PubMed ID: 37640960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions.
    Fontanesi L; Gluth S; Spektor MS; Rieskamp J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1099-1121. PubMed ID: 30924057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of parameter uncertainty for an activated sludge model using Bayesian inference: a comparison with the frequentist method.
    Zonta ZJ; Flotats X; Magrí A
    Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):1618-29. PubMed ID: 24956752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond Drift Diffusion Models: Fitting a Broad Class of Decision and Reinforcement Learning Models with HDDM.
    Fengler A; Bera K; Pedersen ML; Frank MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 34(10):1780-1805. PubMed ID: 35939629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the use of Bayesian methods for evaluating compartmental neural models.
    Baldi P; Vanier MC; Bower JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 1998 Jul; 5(3):285-314. PubMed ID: 9663553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.
    Pedersen ML; Frank MJ; Biele G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1234-1251. PubMed ID: 27966103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence and Urgency Related EEG Signals during Dynamic Decision-Making in Humans.
    Yau Y; Hinault T; Taylor M; Cisek P; Fellows LK; Dagher A
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(26):5711-5722. PubMed ID: 34035140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Think fast! The implications of emphasizing urgency in decision-making.
    Evans NJ
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104704. PubMed ID: 33975126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.