BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37550681)

  • 1. Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) protocol yields lower euploidy rate in older patients undergoing IVF.
    Pai AH; Sung YJ; Li CJ; Lin CY; Chang CL
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 37550681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of euploidy rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles with progestin-primed versus GnRH agonist/antagonist protocol.
    Wang L; Wang J; Zhang Y; Qian C; Wang X; Bai J; Li F; Chen Z; Ai A
    Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):28. PubMed ID: 36642707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response.
    Xiao ZN; Peng JL; Yang J; Xu WM
    Curr Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 39(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 31209815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the cumulative live birth rates after 1 in vitro fertilization cycle in women using gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol vs. progestin-primed ovarian stimulation: a propensity score-matched study.
    Chen H; Teng XM; Sun ZL; Yao D; Wang Z; Chen ZQ
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Oct; 118(4):701-712. PubMed ID: 35940929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
    Martinez F; Clua E; Roca M; Garcia S; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2777-2786. PubMed ID: 36269092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cumulative live birth rates between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in different populations.
    Zhou R; Dong M; Huang L; Wang S; Fan L; Liang X; Zhang X; Liu F
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1117513. PubMed ID: 37143731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function.
    Xu S; Wang X; Zhang Y; Han Y; Zhang C
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2023 Dec; 39(1):2217263. PubMed ID: 37236243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation.
    La Marca A; Capuzzo M; Sacchi S; Imbrogno MG; Spinella F; Varricchio MT; Minasi MG; Greco P; Fiorentino F; Greco E
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 32395749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between controlled ovarian stimulation protocols and euploid blastocyst rate in pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.
    Huang B; Li H; Xu B; Li N; Wang X; Li Y; Zhao J
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 Dec; 21(1):118. PubMed ID: 38057895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Patients With Low Prognosis.
    Du M; Zhang J; Li Z; Liu X; Li J; Liu W; Guan Y
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():705264. PubMed ID: 34589055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Yu S; Long H; Chang HY; Liu Y; Gao H; Zhu J; Quan X; Lyu Q; Kuang Y; Ai A
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 29300975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of cumulative live birth rate and perinatal outcomes in young patients with low anti-müllerian hormone levels using two ovulation promotion protocols: A cohort study.
    Li Z; Jia R; Wang K; Zhang J; Ren B; Guan Y
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():938500. PubMed ID: 35992097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Outcomes of Aged Infertile Women Who Failed to Get Pregnant in the First IVF/ ICSI Cycle: A Self-controlled Study.
    Chen YM; Qi QR; Xie QZ; Yang YF; Xia Y; Zhou XD
    Curr Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 38(3):513-518. PubMed ID: 30074220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing
    Yang L; Liang F; Yuan Y; Luo X; Wang Q; Yao L; Zhang X
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1224858. PubMed ID: 37795363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medroxyprogesterone acetate: an alternative to GnRH-antagonist in oocyte vitrification for social fertility preservation and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
    Giles J; Cruz M; Cobo A; Vidal C; Requena A; Remohi J; Bosch E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Aug; 47(2):103222. PubMed ID: 37290978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oocyte competence is comparable between progestin primed ovarian stimulation with Norethisterone acetate (NETA-PPOS) and GnRH-antagonist protocols: A matched case-control study in PGT-A cycles.
    Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Ruffa A; Rania E; Pittana E; Gallo C; Fiorenza A; Alviggi E; Alfano S; Carmelo R; Trabucco E; Alviggi C; Rosaria Campitiello M; Rienzi L; Maria Ubaldi F; Venturella R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():4-10. PubMed ID: 38171151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
    Huang P; Tang M; Qin A
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 48(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 30321608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates Between Progestin and GnRH Analogues in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles.
    Zhou R; Dong M; Huang L; Wang S; Wang Z; Xu L; Zhang X; Liu F
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2023 Dec; 109(1):217-226. PubMed ID: 37450562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization cycle via progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve: an open-label, randomized controlled trial.
    Ye H; Shi L; Quan X; Hou M; Ma H; Xue S; Yu Z; Chen Q; Sun L
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2024 Dec; 27(1):2316005. PubMed ID: 38357937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates Between GnRH-A and PPOS in Low-Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study.
    Zhang S; Yin Y; Li Q; Zhang C
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():644456. PubMed ID: 34234739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.