These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. ECochG and psychoacoustic tests compared in identification of hearing loss in young children. Parving A; Elberling C; Salomon G Audiology; 1981; 20(5):365-81. PubMed ID: 7271590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Recommendations for masking in pure tone threshold audiometry. British Society of Audiology. Br J Audiol; 1986 Nov; 20(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 3790774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Online Simulation Education for Audiometry Training. Calandruccio L; Weidman D Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34958736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evoked otoacoustic emissions--an approach for monitoring cisplatin induced ototoxicity in children. Stavroulaki P; Apostolopoulos N; Segas J; Tsakanikos M; Adamopoulos G Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 May; 59(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 11376818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Pure-tone audiometry (air and bone conductive threshold test)]. Shidara J; Kodera K Nihon Rinsho; 1997 Mar; 55 Suppl 1():466-8. PubMed ID: 9097652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Further interpretation of the threshold of octave masking (TOM) test. Olsen CC; Berry GA Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):217-33. PubMed ID: 531475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Visual reinforcement audiometry: an Adobe Flash based approach. Atherton S J Vis Commun Med; 2010 Sep; 33(3):110-2. PubMed ID: 20828255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical use of BOBCAT: testing reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry with noise-exposed workers, children and the aged. Picard M; Ilecki HJ; Baxter JD Audiology; 1993; 32(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 8447762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Pure tone audiometer screening tests. J N Y State Sch Nurse Teach Assoc; 1975; 6(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 1078854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. On prediction of hearing disability. Parving A; Ostri B; Katholm M; Parbo J Audiology; 1986; 25(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 3753301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [The application of the same frequency tone masking test in forensic identification]. Liu JH; Xu JT; Li YF Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 15931742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The SISI test: a review. Part II. Buus S; Florentine M; Redden RB Audiology; 1982; 21(5):365-85. PubMed ID: 6751308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Aoyagi M; Yamazaki Y; Yokota M; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Itoh S; Watanabe T Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():6-10. PubMed ID: 8740802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. PC-based tele-audiometry. Choi JM; Lee HB; Park CS; Oh SH; Park KS Telemed J E Health; 2007 Oct; 13(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 17999612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria. Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Development of High-performance Hearing Test System]. Cao L; Li Y; Huang H; Deng Z; Wu B; Liu P; Peng Z Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 46(2):152-155. PubMed ID: 35411740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The AudioScope: a clinical tool for otoscopic and audiometric examination. Bienvenue GR; Michael PL; Chaffinch JC; Zeigler J Ear Hear; 1985; 6(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 4054439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]