148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37550825)
21. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment.
Wengert GJ; Dabi Y; Kermarrec E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Poncelet E; Porcher R; Thomassin-Naggara I; Rockall AG;
Radiology; 2022 Jun; 303(3):566-575. PubMed ID: 35230183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Non-contrast MRI can accurately characterize adnexal masses: a retrospective study.
Sahin H; Panico C; Ursprung S; Simeon V; Chiodini P; Frary A; Carmo B; Smith J; Freeman S; Jimenez-Linan M; Bolton H; Haldar K; Ang JE; Reinhold C; Sala E; Addley H
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6962-6973. PubMed ID: 33725187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound to predict malignancy risk in adnexal lesions.
Li Y; Shao G; Wu M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Shao C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Feb; 50(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 37990446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MR Imaging: Nuts and Bolts.
Melamud K; Hindman N; Sadowski E
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2023 Feb; 31(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 36368864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adnexal Mass Imaging: Contemporary Guidelines for Clinical Practice.
Roseland ME; Maturen KE; Shampain KL; Wasnik AP; Stein EB
Radiol Clin North Am; 2023 Jul; 61(4):671-685. PubMed ID: 37169431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency between the O-RADS US risk stratification system and doctors' subjective judgment.
Zhou S; Guo Y; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M; Zhao B
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):190. PubMed ID: 37986051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of Adding Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADCmean) Measurements to O-RADS MRI Scoring For Adnexal Lesions Characterization: A Combined O-RADS MRI/ADCmean Approach.
Elshetry ASF; Hamed EM; Frere RAF; Zaid NA
Acad Radiol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 36085271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses.
Wang T; Cui W; Nie F; Huang X; Huang L; Liu L; Zhu Y; Zheng R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2072-2080. PubMed ID: 37321953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Practical Tips for Reporting Adnexal Lesions Using O-RADS MRI.
Suarez-Weiss KE; Sadowski EA; Zhang M; Burk KS; Tran VT; Shinagare AB
Radiographics; 2023 Jul; 43(7):e220142. PubMed ID: 37319025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. O-RADS MRI After Initial Ultrasound for Adnexal Lesions:
Sadowski EA; Stein EB; Thomassin-Naggara I; Rockall A; Nougaret S; Reinhold C; Maturen KE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 35975887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS US scoring system among sonologists with different training levels.
Wu M; Zhang M; Cao J; Wu S; Chen Y; Luo L; Lin X; Su M; Zhang X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 308(2):631-637. PubMed ID: 35994107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status?
Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee.
Sadowski EA; Thomassin-Naggara I; Rockall A; Maturen KE; Forstner R; Jha P; Nougaret S; Siegelman ES; Reinhold C
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 35040672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.
Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the performance of the O-RADS MRI score for the evaluation of adnexal masses, with technical notes.
Pereira PN; Yoshida A; Sarian LO; Barros RHO; Jales RM; Derchain S
Radiol Bras; 2022; 55(3):137-144. PubMed ID: 35795605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI in complex adnexal masses: A preliminary study.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Soualhi N; Balvay D; Darai E; Cuenod CA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 28370815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.
Wang R; Yang Z
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 36929789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound.
Xu J; Huang Z; Zeng J; Zheng Z; Cao J; Su M; Zhang X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1527-1534. PubMed ID: 37032238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
