These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37551)

  • 1. Evaluation of pH monitoring as a method of processor control.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Winkler NT
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 37551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flood replenishment: a new method of processor control.
    Frank ED; Gray JE; Wilken DA
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 7280210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic solution contamination.
    Hardman PK; Tilmon MF; Taylor TS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jun; 63(6):733-7. PubMed ID: 3473399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality control of the automatic processor.
    Legg LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
    Hoeschen D; Buhr E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography film processor replenishment rate: bromide level monitoring.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wuelfing P; Kitts EL; Cagnon C; Basic M; Bassett L
    Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 9089588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [PC-assisted network for quality control in film development].
    Buchberger W; Giacomuzzi SM; Springer P
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 9081409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quality control of laser imagers].
    Winkelbauer F; Ammann M; Gerstner N; Imhof H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 1457474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the darkroom in radiograph quality control.
    Wolfgang L
    N Y State Dent J; 1998; 64(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 9707980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of five methods for monitoring the precision of automated x-ray film processors.
    Nickoloff EL; Leo F; Reese M
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 704868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Silver recovery and fixer management: a new approach.
    Green A; Levenson GI
    Radiography; 1981 Oct; 47(562):225-34. PubMed ID: 7330176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developer pH: its significance in quality control.
    Basart JA
    Radiol Technol; 1974; 45(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 4826379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elimination of electrostatic discharges in automatic daylight film processor systems. A simple, cost-effective solution. Technical note.
    Asp T; Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 2509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of conventional roentgen equipment].
    Nowotny R; Bliem J
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():30-7. PubMed ID: 3705123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer analysis of processor status.
    Allison JD; David GS; Young RG
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):592-3. PubMed ID: 6340162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of several sensitometers for use in processing quality assurance.
    Goldman LW; Watkins RT
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 493499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.