These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37551765)

  • 1. Managing uncertainty in decision-making for conservation science.
    Ben-Haim Y
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14164. PubMed ID: 37551765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the Value of Information to improve conservation decision making.
    Bolam FC; Grainger MJ; Mengersen KL; Stewart GB; Sutherland WJ; Runge MC; McGowan PJK
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Apr; 94(2):629-647. PubMed ID: 30280477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing ecosystem service investments that are robust to uncertainty across multiple parameters.
    Chisholm RA; Wintle BA
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Mar; 22(2):697-704. PubMed ID: 22611865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An introduction to decision science for conservation.
    Hemming V; Camaclang AE; Adams MS; Burgman M; Carbeck K; Carwardine J; Chadès I; Chalifour L; Converse SJ; Davidson LNK; Garrard GE; Finn R; Fleri JR; Huard J; Mayfield HJ; Madden EM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Possingham HP; Rumpff L; Runge MC; Stewart D; Tulloch VJD; Walshe T; Martin TG
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13868. PubMed ID: 34856010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust Satisficing Decision Making for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex Missions under Severe Uncertainty.
    Ji X; Niu Y; Shen L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166448. PubMed ID: 27835670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making conservation decisions under uncertainty for the persistence of multiple species.
    Nicholson E; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Jan; 17(1):251-65. PubMed ID: 17479849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effective surveillance of invasive species using info-gap theory.
    Liu Y; Wang P; Thomas ML; Zheng D; McKirdy SJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22828. PubMed ID: 34819566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.
    Cook CN; Mascia MB; Schwartz MW; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):669-78. PubMed ID: 23574343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Info-gap management of public health Policy for TB with HIV-prevalence and epidemiological uncertainty.
    Ben-Haim Y; Dacso CC; Zetola NM
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Dec; 12():1091. PubMed ID: 23249291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence and uncertainty: An info-gap analysis of uncertainty-augmenting evidence.
    Ben-Haim Y
    Risk Anal; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38844424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
    Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections.
    Kujala H; Moilanen A; Araújo MB; Cabeza M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e53315. PubMed ID: 23405068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using decision science to evaluate global biodiversity indices.
    Watermeyer KE; Guillera-Arroita G; Bal P; Burgass MJ; Bland LM; Collen B; Hallam C; Kelly LT; McCarthy MA; Regan TJ; Stevenson S; Wintle BA; Nicholson E
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32557849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contending with uncertainty in conservation management decisions.
    McCarthy MA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Aug; 1322(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 25138920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assigning trend-based conservation status despite high uncertainty.
    White RSA; Stoffels RJ; Whitehead AL
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Aug; 37(4):e14084. PubMed ID: 36919474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prioritizing species conservation programs based on IUCN Green Status and estimates of cost-sharing potential.
    Lloyd NA; Keating LM; Friesen AJ; Cole DM; McPherson JM; Akçakaya HR; Moehrenschlager A
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14051. PubMed ID: 36661059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining decision thresholds and evaluating indicators when conservation status is measured as a continuum.
    Connors BM; Cooper AB
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25155174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
    Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building robust conservation plans.
    Visconti P; Joppa L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.