These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3755193)

  • 1. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vowel discrimination with the single-electrode cochlear implant: a pilot study.
    Dent LJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):41-6. PubMed ID: 6805396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Laitakari J; Sivonen V; Muhli A
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 21070135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech production changes with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Cummings S; Groenewald E; Coetzee L; Hugo R; Van Derlinde M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():394-7. PubMed ID: 7668719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory/visual speech perception by cochlear implant users and hearing aid wearers.
    Danhauer JL; Erratt JD; Edgerton BJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Sep; 7(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 3789122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P; Smith CA; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation.
    Evans MK; Deliyski DD
    J Voice; 2007 Nov; 21(6):669-82. PubMed ID: 16952440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants.
    Ménard L; Polak M; Denny M; Burton E; Lane H; Matthies ML; Marrone N; Perkell JS; Tiede M; Vick J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3790-801. PubMed ID: 17552727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants.
    Mildner V; Liker M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(10-11):845-56. PubMed ID: 18608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.