280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37552298)
21. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reflex high-risk human papilloma virus DNA test is useful in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Wu HH; Allen SL; Kirkpatrick JL; Elsheikh TM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Oct; 34(10):707-10. PubMed ID: 16955480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The clinician's view: role of human papillomavirus testing in the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cytology and cervical cancer precursors.
Cox JT;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 12952506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Follow-up testing after colposcopy: five-year risk of CIN 2+ after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less.
Katki HA; Gage JC; Schiffman M; Castle PE; Fetterman B; Poitras NE; Lorey T; Cheung LC; Raine-Bennett T; Kinney WK
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Apr; 17(5 Suppl 1):S69-77. PubMed ID: 23519308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Safaeian M; Solomon D; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Castle P
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17540804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pooled analysis on the necessity of random 4-quadrant cervical biopsies and endocervical curettage in women with positive screening but negative colposcopy.
Hu SY; Zhang WH; Li SM; Li N; Huang MN; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Han Y; Zhao FH; Chen W; Qiao YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Apr; 96(17):e6689. PubMed ID: 28445270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [HPV E6 and E7 mRNA combined with HPV 16 and 18 or 45 genotyping testing as a means of cervical cancer opportunistic screening].
Wang JJ; Dong J; Deng ZX; Wang PF; Zhang XX; Du Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 May; 54(5):301-306. PubMed ID: 31154710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of p16(INK4a) cytology testing as an adjunct to enhance the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in human papillomavirus-positive women within an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Gustinucci D; Passamonti B; Cesarini E; Butera D; Palmieri EA; Bulletti S; Carlani A; Staiano M; D'Amico MR; D'Angelo V; Di Dato E; Martinelli N; Malaspina M; Spita N; Tintori B; Fulciniti F
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):506-14. PubMed ID: 23075891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic performance, human papillomavirus testing, and follow-up results.
Srodon M; Parry Dilworth H; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16136595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program.
Gage JC; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Katki HA; Cheung LC; Cuzick J; Myers O; Castle PE; Wheeler CM;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jan; 25(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 26518316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Impact of Triage for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance with Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan.
Fujiwara H; Suzuki M; Morisawa H; Sayama M; Kimura K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 20(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30678384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The low risk of precancer after a screening result of human papillomavirus-negative/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance papanicolaou and implications for clinical management.
Gage JC; Katki HA; Schiffman M; Castle PE; Fetterman B; Poitras NE; Lorey T; Cheung LC; Behrens C; Sharma A; Zhao FH; Cuzick J; Yang ZH; Kinney WK
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Nov; 122(11):842-50. PubMed ID: 25045058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of type-specific human papillomavirus infections on the detection of cervical precancer and cancer: A population-based study of opportunistic cervical screening in the United States.
Wheeler CM; Hunt WC; Cuzick J; Langsfeld E; Robertson M; Castle PE;
Int J Cancer; 2014 Aug; 135(3):624-34. PubMed ID: 24226935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Aptima and hybrid capture-2 HPV tests and Pap test in the referral population in Japan.
Kuroki H; Sakamoto J; Shibata T; Takakura M; Sasagawa T
J Med Virol; 2021 Aug; 93(8):5076-5083. PubMed ID: 33634473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers.
Wentzensen N; Walker J; Smith K; Gold MA; Zuna R; Massad LS; Liu A; Silver MI; Dunn ST; Schiffman M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8. PubMed ID: 29462629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
