These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3755325)

  • 41. A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.
    Felli JC; Leishman DJ
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020 Sep; 105():106898. PubMed ID: 32735877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity.
    Beck JR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Aug; 110(8):685-6. PubMed ID: 3755323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visualizing the impact of prevalence on a diagnostic test.
    Rehling M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2010 Oct; 70(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 20645678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparing Rasch analyses probability estimates to sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios when examining the utility of medical diagnostic tests.
    Cipriani D; Fox C; Khuder S; Boudreau N
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(2):180-201. PubMed ID: 15795486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology Part 4: everyday probabilities--nonbinary diagnostic tests.
    Shin JJ; Stinnett SS; Randolph GW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 149(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 23715687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A computer program to determine diagnostic decision thresholds and likelihood ratios illustrated with aspartate aminotransferase activities after a myocardial infarction.
    Pellar TG; Galbraith LV; Leung FY; Henderson AR
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1989 Nov; 26 ( Pt 6)():533-7. PubMed ID: 2619233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. On repeated screening tests.
    Lau TS
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):891-8. PubMed ID: 2790127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Use of likelihood ratio computation to standardize the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests.
    Montori VM; Ebbert JO
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2000 Apr; 75(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 10761502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [From symptom to therapy: clinical reasoning].
    Reinhart WH
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Nov; 91(46):1981-5. PubMed ID: 12476604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A formula for estimating pretest probability: evaluation and clinical application.
    Gayed NM; Kern DE
    J Gen Intern Med; 1990; 5(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 2374041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A critique on contemporary reporting of likelihood ratios in test power analysis.
    Weissler AM; Bailey KR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Oct; 79(10):1317-8. PubMed ID: 15473417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Evaluation of diagnostic test results to aid in probability and likelihood ratios].
    Mortensen PB; Jacobsen BA; Møller-Petersen J; Rasmussen SN
    Nord Med; 1989; 104(8-9):234-6. PubMed ID: 2780282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The interpretation of diagnostic test: a primer for physiotherapists.
    Davidson M
    Aust J Physiother; 2002; 48(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 12217073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Performance evaluation (validation) of diagnosis].
    Röding H; Schenke K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(16):1001-10. PubMed ID: 3673309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Average Weighted Accuracy: Pragmatic Analysis for a Rapid Diagnostics in Categorizing Acute Lung Infections (RADICAL) Study.
    Liu Y; Tsalik EL; Jiang Y; Ko ER; Woods CW; Henao R; Evans SR
    Clin Infect Dis; 2020 Jun; 70(12):2736-2742. PubMed ID: 31157863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2005 Apr 23-29; 365(9469):1500-5. PubMed ID: 15850636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.
    Simel DL; Samsa GP; Matchar DB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(8):763-70. PubMed ID: 1941027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A review on the methodology for assessing diagnostic tests.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1988 Jul; 34(7):1379-86. PubMed ID: 3292081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Graphic representation of numerically calculated predictive values: an easily comprehended method of evaluating diagnostic tests.
    Daniel BL; Daniel TM
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 8246708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.