These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37553269)

  • 21. Highly Localized Acoustic Streaming and Size-Selective Submicrometer Particle Concentration Using High Frequency Microscale Focused Acoustic Fields.
    Collins DJ; Ma Z; Ai Y
    Anal Chem; 2016 May; 88(10):5513-22. PubMed ID: 27102956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Continuous micro-vortex-based nanoparticle manipulation via focused surface acoustic waves.
    Collins DJ; Ma Z; Han J; Ai Y
    Lab Chip; 2016 Dec; 17(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 27883136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fully Microfabricated Surface Acoustic Wave Tweezer for Collection of Submicron Particles and Human Blood Cells.
    Fakhfouri A; Colditz M; Devendran C; Ivanova K; Jacob S; Neild A; Winkler A
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 May; 15(20):24023-24033. PubMed ID: 37188328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Formation of inverse Chladni patterns in liquids at microscale: roles of acoustic radiation and streaming-induced drag forces.
    Lei J
    Microfluid Nanofluidics; 2017; 21(3):50. PubMed ID: 32226357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultrasonic manipulation of particles and cells. Ultrasonic separation of cells.
    Coakley WT; Whitworth G; Grundy MA; Gould RK; Allman R
    Bioseparation; 1994 Apr; 4(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 7765041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustophoretic Control of Microparticle Transport Using Dual-Wavelength Surface Acoustic Wave Devices.
    Hsu JC; Hsu CH; Huang YW
    Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 30642118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sub-micron particle manipulation in an ultrasonic standing wave: applications in detection of clinically important biomolecules.
    Sobanski MA; Tucker CR; Thomas NE; Coakley WT
    Bioseparation; 2000; 9(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 11518238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional modeling and experimentation of microfluidic devices driven by surface acoustic wave.
    Liu X; Zheng T; Wang C
    Ultrasonics; 2023 Mar; 129():106914. PubMed ID: 36577304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic radiation- and streaming-induced microparticle velocities determined by microparticle image velocimetry in an ultrasound symmetry plane.
    Barnkob R; Augustsson P; Laurell T; Bruus H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Nov; 86(5 Pt 2):056307. PubMed ID: 23214876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigation into the Effect of Acoustic Radiation Force and Acoustic Streaming on Particle Patterning in Acoustic Standing Wave Fields.
    Liu S; Yang Y; Ni Z; Guo X; Luo L; Tu J; Zhang D; Zhang AJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jul; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 28753955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The importance of travelling wave components in standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW) systems.
    Devendran C; Albrecht T; Brenker J; Alan T; Neild A
    Lab Chip; 2016 Sep; 16(19):3756-3766. PubMed ID: 27722363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Continuous Particle Aggregation and Separation in Acoustofluidic Microchannels Driven by Standing Lamb Waves.
    Hsu JC; Chang CY
    Micromachines (Basel); 2022 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 36557473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Residue-free acoustofluidic manipulation of microparticles via removal of microchannel anechoic corner.
    Khan MS; Sahin MA; Destgeer G; Park J
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2022 Sep; 89():106161. PubMed ID: 36088893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Separation of Escherichia coli bacteria from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using standing surface acoustic waves.
    Ai Y; Sanders CK; Marrone BL
    Anal Chem; 2013 Oct; 85(19):9126-34. PubMed ID: 23968497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numerical study of the effect of channel aspect ratio on particle focusing in acoustophoretic devices.
    Spigarelli L; Vasile NS; Pirri CF; Canavese G
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19447. PubMed ID: 33173108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Particle separation in microfluidics using different modal ultrasonic standing waves.
    Zhang Y; Chen X
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2021 Jul; 75():105603. PubMed ID: 34044322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustophoresis-driven particle focusing and separation with standard/inverse Chladni patterns.
    Zhao X; Hao N
    Lab Chip; 2024 Jun; 24(12):3149-3157. PubMed ID: 38787691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phononic-Crystal-Based Particle Sieving in Continuous Flow: Numerical Simulations.
    Huang L; Zhou J; Kong D; Li F
    Micromachines (Basel); 2022 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 36557480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental and numerical studies on standing surface acoustic wave microfluidics.
    Mao Z; Xie Y; Guo F; Ren L; Huang PH; Chen Y; Rufo J; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2016 Feb; 16(3):515-24. PubMed ID: 26698361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustophoresis in polymer-based microfluidic devices: Modeling and experimental validation.
    Lickert F; Ohlin M; Bruus H; Ohlsson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4281. PubMed ID: 34241446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.