These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37554062)

  • 1. The Impact of Victim Demeanor on Jurors' Perceptions of a Sexual Harassment Victim.
    Jenkins BD; Sawaya S; Rawn KP; Pals AM; Le Grand AM; Levi MM; Golding JM
    Violence Against Women; 2023 Dec; 29(15-16):3325-3348. PubMed ID: 37554062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial.
    Golding JM; Fryman HM; Marsil DF; Yozwiak JA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1311-21. PubMed ID: 14637304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
    Miller QC; Call AA; London K
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case.
    Cass SA; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 19579260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?
    Nitschke FT; McKimmie BM; Vanman EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 145(10):953-979. PubMed ID: 31282696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Jurors' reactions to satanic ritual abuse allegations.
    Bottoms BL; Diviak KR; Davis SL
    Child Abuse Negl; 1997 Sep; 21(9):845-59. PubMed ID: 9298262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
    Call AA; Wingrove T
    J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mock Juror Perceptions of a Male or Female Adult Rape Victim Crying in the Courtroom.
    Pals AM; Levi MM; Meier JR; Jenkins BD; Le Grand AM; Golding JM
    Violence Against Women; 2023 Apr; ():10778012231166404. PubMed ID: 37013381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Gender on Perceptions of Credibility in Child Sexual Assault Cases: A Systematic Review.
    Voogt A; Klettke B
    J Child Sex Abus; 2017; 26(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 28350262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
    Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
    Wuensch KL; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elder sexual abuse and implicit agism: examining the warm-incompetent bias among mock jurors.
    Syme ML; Cohn TJ
    J Elder Abuse Negl; 2020; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 31760911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
    Martschuk N; Sporer SL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment.
    McCabe MP; Hardman L
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 145(6):719-40. PubMed ID: 16334516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing victim attributions and outcomes for workplace aggression and sexual harassment.
    Hershcovis MS; Barling J
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Sep; 95(5):874-88. PubMed ID: 20718532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.