169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37554626)
1. Analyzing the influence of oblique incidence on quantitative backscattering tissue polarimetry: a pilot
Zhang Z; Shao C; He H; He C; Liu S; Ma H
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102905. PubMed ID: 37554626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis and optimization of aberration induced by oblique incidence for in-vivo tissue polarimetry.
Zhang Z; Hao R; Shao C; Mi C; He H; He C; Du E; Liu S; Wu J; Ma H
Opt Lett; 2023 Dec; 48(23):6136-6139. PubMed ID: 38039210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complex Spatial Illumination Scheme Optimization of Backscattering Mueller Matrix Polarimetry for Tissue Imaging and Biosensing.
Jiao W; Zhang Z; Zeng N; Hao R; He H; He C; Ma H
Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38667201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of the imaging contrasts of Mueller matrix derived parameters between transmission and backscattering polarimetry.
Liu T; Sun T; He H; Liu S; Dong Y; Wu J; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Sep; 9(9):4413-4428. PubMed ID: 30615708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of tissue polarimetric properties using Stokes polarimetric imaging with circularly polarized illumination.
Qi J; He H; Lin J; Dong Y; Chen D; Ma H; Elson DS
J Biophotonics; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e201700139. PubMed ID: 29131523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrepancy of coordinate system selection in backscattering Mueller matrix polarimetry: exploring photon coordinate system transformation invariants.
Hao R; Zeng N; Zhang Z; He H; He C; Ma H
Opt Express; 2024 Jan; 32(3):3804-3816. PubMed ID: 38297593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of differential matrix and extended polar decomposition formalisms for polarimetric characterization of complex tissue-like turbid media.
Kumar S; Purwar H; Ossikovski R; Vitkin IA; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):105006. PubMed ID: 23064484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of tissue microstructure with Mueller microscopy: logarithmic decomposition and Monte Carlo modeling.
Li P; Lee HR; Chandel S; Lotz C; Groeber-Becker FK; Dembski S; Ossikovski R; Ma H; Novikova T
J Biomed Opt; 2020 Jan; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31933331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wide-field Mueller matrix polarimetry for spectral characterization of basic biological tissues: Muscle, fat, connective tissue, and skin.
Pardo I; Bian S; Gomis-Brescó J; Pascual E; Canillas A; Bosch S; Arteaga O
J Biophotonics; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e202300252. PubMed ID: 37743627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterizing colon cancer stages through optical polarimetry-assisted digital staining.
Sharma M; Unni SN; Shaji C; Balasubramanian S; Sundaram S
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 39(1):59. PubMed ID: 38336913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mueller-matrix imaging polarimetry elevated by wavelet decomposition and polarization-singular processing for analysis of specific cancerous tissue pathology.
Sdobnov A; Ushenko VA; Trifonyuk L; Bakun O; Garazdyuk M; Soltys IV; Dubolazov O; Ushenko OG; Ushenko YA; Bykov A; Meglinski I
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102903. PubMed ID: 37425430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probing layered structures by multi-color backscattering polarimetry and machine learning.
Zhu Y; Dong Y; Yao Y; Si L; Liu Y; He H; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Jul; 12(7):4324-4339. PubMed ID: 34457417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating backscattering polarized light imaging microstructural mapping capabilities through neural tissue and analogous phantom imaging.
Bonaventura J; Morara K; Carlson R; Comrie C; Twer A; Hutchinson E; Sawyer TW
J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052914. PubMed ID: 38077501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration of polarimetric images for in vivo skin diagnostics.
Jütte L; Sharma G; Patel H; Roth B
J Biomed Opt; 2022 Aug; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 36042549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review.
Qi J; Elson DS
J Biophotonics; 2017 Aug; 10(8):950-982. PubMed ID: 28464464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mueller matrix imaging of prostate bulk tissues; Polarization parameters as a discriminating benchmark.
Badieyan S; Ameri A; Razzaghi MR; Rafii-Tabar H; Sasanpour P
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Jun; 26():90-96. PubMed ID: 30797118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping local orientation of aligned fibrous scatterers for cancerous tissues using backscattering Mueller matrix imaging.
He H; Sun M; Zeng N; Du E; Liu S; Guo Y; Wu J; He Y; Ma H
J Biomed Opt; 2014; 19(10):106007. PubMed ID: 25321399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mueller matrix-based characterization of cervical tissue sections: a quantitative comparison of polar and differential decomposition methods.
Kumar N; Kumar Nayak J; Pradhan A; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052916. PubMed ID: 38328279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications, and outlook.
Ghosh N; Vitkin IA
J Biomed Opt; 2011 Nov; 16(11):110801. PubMed ID: 22112102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative fluorescence and elastic scattering tissue polarimetry using an Eigenvalue calibrated spectroscopic Mueller matrix system.
Soni J; Purwar H; Lakhotia H; Chandel S; Banerjee C; Kumar U; Ghosh N
Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(13):15475-89. PubMed ID: 23842335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
