160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37555750)
1. Caution regarding the specificities of pan-cancer microbial structure.
Gihawi A; Cooper CS; Brewer DS
Microb Genom; 2023 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 37555750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and evaluation of a colorectal cancer screening method using machine learning-based gut microbiota analysis.
Konishi Y; Okumura S; Matsumoto T; Itatani Y; Nishiyama T; Okazaki Y; Shibutani M; Ohtani N; Nagahara H; Obama K; Ohira M; Sakai Y; Nagayama S; Hara E
Cancer Med; 2022 Aug; 11(16):3194-3206. PubMed ID: 35318827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gut Microbes Meet Machine Learning: The Next Step towards Advancing Our Understanding of the Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease.
Giuffrè M; Moretti R; Tiribelli C
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 36982303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning-based approaches for cancer prediction using microbiome data.
Freitas P; Silva F; Sousa JV; Ferreira RM; Figueiredo C; Pereira T; Oliveira HP
Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11821. PubMed ID: 37479864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Profiling of the Conjunctival Bacterial Microbiota Reveals the Feasibility of Utilizing a Microbiome-Based Machine Learning Model to Differentially Diagnose Microbial Keratitis and the Core Components of the Conjunctival Bacterial Interaction Network.
Ren Z; Li W; Liu Q; Dong Y; Huang Y
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():860370. PubMed ID: 35558101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning for data integration in human gut microbiome.
Li P; Luo H; Ji B; Nielsen J
Microb Cell Fact; 2022 Nov; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 36419034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From hype to hope: Considerations in conducting robust microbiome science.
McGuinness AJ; Stinson LF; Snelson M; Loughman A; Stringer A; Hannan AJ; Cowan CSM; Jama HA; Caparros-Martin JA; West ML; Wardill HR;
Brain Behav Immun; 2024 Jan; 115():120-130. PubMed ID: 37806533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of machine learning technologies in gut microbiome research and cancer studies - A review.
Loganathan T; Priya Doss C G
Life Sci; 2022 Dec; 311(Pt A):121118. PubMed ID: 36404489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population Informative Markers Selected Using Wright's Fixation Index and Machine Learning Improves Human Identification Using the Skin Microbiome.
Sherier AJ; Woerner AE; Budowle B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 87(20):e0120821. PubMed ID: 34379455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using gut microbiota as a diagnostic tool for colorectal cancer: machine learning techniques reveal promising results.
Lu F; Lei T; Zhou J; Liang H; Cui P; Zuo T; Ye L; Chen H; Huang J
J Med Microbiol; 2023 Jun; 72(6):. PubMed ID: 37288545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.
Koedooder R; Singer M; Schoenmakers S; Savelkoul PHM; Morré SA; de Jonge JD; Poort L; Cuypers WJSS; Beckers NGM; Broekmans FJM; Cohlen BJ; den Hartog JE; Fleischer K; Lambalk CB; Smeenk JMJS; Budding AE; Laven JSE
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1042-1054. PubMed ID: 31119299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nine (not so simple) steps: a practical guide to using machine learning in microbial ecology.
Walsh C; Stallard-Olivera E; Fierer N
mBio; 2024 Feb; 15(2):e0205023. PubMed ID: 38126787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stool microbiota are superior to saliva in distinguishing cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy using machine learning.
Saboo K; Petrakov NV; Shamsaddini A; Fagan A; Gavis EA; Sikaroodi M; McGeorge S; Gillevet PM; Iyer RK; Bajaj JS
J Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 76(3):600-607. PubMed ID: 34793867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning methods for microbiome studies.
Namkung J
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):206-216. PubMed ID: 32108316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Studies: Issues and Recommendations.
Eisenhofer R; Minich JJ; Marotz C; Cooper A; Knight R; Weyrich LS
Trends Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 27(2):105-117. PubMed ID: 30497919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine Learning Predicts Biogeochemistry from Microbial Community Structure in a Complex Model System.
Dutta A; Goldman T; Keating J; Burke E; Williamson N; Dirmeier R; Bowman JS
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0190921. PubMed ID: 35138192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and reproducibility assessment in a large-scale population-based microbiota study: case study on human milk microbiota.
Moossavi S; Fehr K; Khafipour E; Azad MB
Microbiome; 2021 Feb; 9(1):41. PubMed ID: 33568231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene-based microbiome representation enhances host phenotype classification.
Deschênes T; Tohoundjona FWE; Plante PL; Di Marzo V; Raymond F
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0053123. PubMed ID: 37404032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining Machine Learning and Network Analysis Pipelines: The Case of Microbiome and Metabolomics Data in Colorectal Cancer.
Ntzioni E; Chouvarda I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jan; 289():489-490. PubMed ID: 35062198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
