These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37555771)

  • 1. Prosodic and durational influences on the formant dynamics of Japanese vowels.
    Tanner J
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Aug; 3(8):. PubMed ID: 37555771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results.
    Tabain M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):516-31. PubMed ID: 12558288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distance vs time. Acoustic and articulatory consequences of reduced vowel duration in Polish.
    Strycharczuk P; Ćavar M; Coretta S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):592. PubMed ID: 34340503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intonational Structure Influences Perception of Contrastive Vowel Length: The Case of Phrase-Final Lengthening in Tokyo Japanese.
    Steffman J; Katsuda H
    Lang Speech; 2021 Dec; 64(4):839-858. PubMed ID: 33251945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability and Variability in Slovak Prosodic Boundaries.
    Benuš Š; Šimko J
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(3-4):163-193. PubMed ID: 28208129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of speaking rate and vowel length on formant frequency displacement in Japanese.
    Hirata Y; Tsukada K
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):129-49. PubMed ID: 19776664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2842-54. PubMed ID: 18189574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning phonemic vowel length from naturalistic recordings of Japanese infant-directed speech.
    Bion RA; Miyazawa K; Kikuchi H; Mazuka R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e51594. PubMed ID: 23437036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction between Phrasal Structure and Vowel Tenseness in German: An Acoustic and Articulatory Study.
    Belz M; Rasskazova O; Krivokapić J; Mooshammer C
    Lang Speech; 2023 Mar; 66(1):3-34. PubMed ID: 35021902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: dialect variation within and across regions.
    Fridland V; Kendall T; Farrington C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):341-9. PubMed ID: 24993218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2603-18. PubMed ID: 19894839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels.
    Leung KK; Jongman A; Wang Y; Sereno JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):45. PubMed ID: 27475131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced contrast for vowels in utterance focus: a cross-language study.
    Hay JF; Sato M; Coren AE; Moran CL; Diehl RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3022-33. PubMed ID: 16708958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An acoustic phonetic description of Nungon vowels.
    Sarvasy H; Elvin J; Li W; Escudero P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2891. PubMed ID: 32359261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic analysis of vowel formant frequencies in genetically-related and non-genetically related speakers with implications for forensic speaker comparison.
    Cavalcanti JC; Eriksson A; Barbosa PA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246645. PubMed ID: 33600430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic markers of prosodic boundaries in Spanish spontaneous alaryngeal speech.
    Cuenca MH; Barrio MM
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Nov; 24(11):859-69. PubMed ID: 20964504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosodic finality and sentence type in French.
    Smith CL
    Lang Speech; 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):141-78. PubMed ID: 12613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English.
    Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3867-78. PubMed ID: 16018489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tonal cues to prosodic structure in rate-dependent speech perception.
    Steffman J; Jun SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3825. PubMed ID: 34852588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.