These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37556073)

  • 21. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
    Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional condylar displacement and remodelling following correction of asymmetric mandibular prognathism with maxillary canting.
    Abotaleb BM; Bi R; Jiang N; Ye B; Bai Y; Al-Watary MQ; Zhu S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 51(6):813-822. PubMed ID: 34924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Radiographic cephalometry analysis of dimensions of condylar processus in persons with mandibular prognathism].
    Cutović T; Pavlović J; Kozomara R
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2008 Jul; 65(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 18700460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
    Oh MH; Hwang HS; Lee KM; Cho JH
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comprehensive three-dimensional positional and morphological assessment of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II patients with mandibular retrognathism in different vertical skeletal patterns.
    Al-Hadad SA; ALyafrusee ES; Abdulqader AA; Al-Gumaei WS; Al-Mohana RAAM; Ren L
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):149. PubMed ID: 35484618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automated Real-Time Evaluation of Condylar Movement in Relation to Three-Dimensional Craniofacial and Temporomandibular Morphometry in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.
    Lee WJ; Park KH; Kang YG; Kim SJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33917213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
    Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry.
    Ohba S; Nakao N; Kawasaki T; Miura KI; Minamizato T; Koga Y; Yoshida N; Asahina I
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 54(8):920-926. PubMed ID: 27372232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are There Mandibular Morphological Differences in the Various Facial Asymmetry Etiologies? A Tomographic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Study.
    López DF; Botero JR; Muñoz JM; Cárdenas-Perilla R; Moreno M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 77(11):2324-2338. PubMed ID: 31276657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nasal characteristics in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism.
    Fan Y; Chen G; He W; Zhang N; Song G; Matthews H; Claes P; Xu T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):680-688. PubMed ID: 35973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
    Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of spherical coordinate system to facial asymmetry analysis in mandibular prognathism patients.
    Yoon SJ; Wang RF; Hwang HS; Kang BC; Lee JS; Palomo JM
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Sep; 41(3):95-100. PubMed ID: 22010065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
    Tyan S; Park HS; Janchivdorj M; Han SH; Kim SJ; Ahn HW
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 26192894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correction of facial asymmetry associated with vertical maxillary excess and mandibular prognathism by combined orthognathic surgery and guiding templates and splints fabricated by rapid prototyping technique.
    Ying B; Ye N; Jiang Y; Liu Y; Hu J; Zhu S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1330-6. PubMed ID: 26194772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Compensations in Subjects With Facial Asymmetry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Retrospective Study.
    Setvaji NR; Muthuswamy Pandian S
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52601. PubMed ID: 38374845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Condylar Displacement and Adaptive Remodeling in Asymmetrical Mandibular Prognathism Patients After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.
    Jha N; Kim M; Cevidanes L; Kim YJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 34(1):240-246. PubMed ID: 36608101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative assessment of condyle positional changes before and after orthognathic surgery based on fused 3D images from cone beam computed tomography.
    Ma RH; Li G; Yin S; Sun Y; Li ZL; Ma XC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2663-2672. PubMed ID: 31728734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Leung MY; Leung YY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29636307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept.
    Yin Q; Bi R; Abotaleb B; Jiang N; Li Y; Zhu S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 57(10):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 31623933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.