132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37556885)
1. Computed vs. film-based radiographs' contour artifacts influence diagnosis of secondary caries.
Danz JC; Flück HP; Campus G; Wolf TG
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Sep; 166():111004. PubMed ID: 37556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.
Vandenberghe B; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 20461423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality.
Sund T; Møystad A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16618843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department.
Gulsahi A; Secgin CK
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26856290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of digital grey-scale modification on the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions.
Verdonschot EH; Kuijpers JM; Polder BJ; De Leng-Worm MH; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 1548386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
