These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37556925)

  • 1. Mechanical behaviour of reconstructed defected skull with custom PEEK implant and Titanium fixture plates under dynamic loading conditions using FEM.
    Jindal P; Bharti J; Gupta V; Dhami SS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106063. PubMed ID: 37556925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach.
    Phanindra Bogu V; Ravi Kumar Y; Kumar Khanra A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Nov; 55(11):2053-2065. PubMed ID: 28474182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities.
    Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
    Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the mechanical behaviour of PEEK and HA cranial implants under impact loading.
    Garcia-Gonzalez D; Jayamohan J; Sotiropoulos SN; Yoon SH; Cook J; Siviour CR; Arias A; Jérusalem A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():342-354. PubMed ID: 28160738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Design Using Finite Element Analysis.
    Huys SEF; Van Gysel A; Mommaerts MY; Sloten JV
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():198-204. PubMed ID: 33529765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
    Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty.
    Zhang J; Su Y; Rao X; Pang H; Zhu H; Liu L; Chen L; Li D; He J; Peng J; Jiang Y
    Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(1):634. PubMed ID: 36844244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical characterization and numerical simulation of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cranial implants.
    El Halabi F; Rodriguez JF; Rebolledo L; Hurtós E; Doblaré M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1819-32. PubMed ID: 22098881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considerations in computer-aided design for inlay cranioplasty: technical note.
    Nout E; Mommaerts MY
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 29313149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
    Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
    Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical performance of Ti-PEEK dental implants in bone: An in-silico analysis.
    Ouldyerou A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Roy S; Mehboob H; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Oct; 134():105422. PubMed ID: 36037710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in implant-supported fixed restorations by finite element analysis.
    Tekin S; Değer Y; Demirci F
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 31489862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of PEEK Coating on Hip Implant Stress Shielding: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Anguiano-Sanchez J; Martinez-Romero O; Siller HR; Diaz-Elizondo JA; Flores-Villalba E; Rodriguez CA
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():6183679. PubMed ID: 27051460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants.
    Lee WT; Koak JY; Lim YJ; Kim SK; Kwon HB; Kim MJ
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 May; 100(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22331553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
    O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method.
    Sarot JR; Contar CM; Cruz AC; de Souza Magini R
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2010 Jul; 21(7):2079-85. PubMed ID: 20464460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.