These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3755830)

  • 61. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.
    Jennings RJ; Eastgate RJ; Siedband MP; Ergun DL
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 7290015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material.
    Ranger NT; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2305-11. PubMed ID: 16121586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
    Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Niobium filters for dose reduction in pediatric radiology.
    Jangland L; Axelsson B
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Sep; 31(5):540-1. PubMed ID: 2261307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Dependence of radiographic sensitivity of CR imaging plate on X-ray tube voltage.
    Asai Y; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jan; 1(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 20821170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
    Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Physical measurements of heavy metal filter performance.
    Burgess AE
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 4000081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Adaptation of the Panorex II for use with rare earth screen-film combinations.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):645-8. PubMed ID: 3459997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?
    Davies AG; Gislason-Lee AJ; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Lupton M; Moore J; Sivananthan M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 24563525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Monte Carlo calculation for microplanar beam radiography.
    Company FZ; Allen BJ; Mino C
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Sep; 23(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 11210159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [The use of copper and niobium filters in diagnostic x-ray equipment. A comparison of dose reduction, tube loading and picture quality].
    Thorsen F; Mehus A; Nordanger J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 Sep; 110(22):2878-80. PubMed ID: 2219065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The effect of thin K-edge filters on radiation dose in dental radiography.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):990-5. PubMed ID: 1450837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
    Aufrichtig R; Xue P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Cephalometic dose reduction with prepatient rare earth filtration.
    Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Bechtold W; Proffit WR
    J Clin Orthod; 1987 Jul; 21(7):470-3. PubMed ID: 3476495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography.
    Williams JR; Catling MK
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.