These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37558401)
1. Experience of reassessing Yoon E; Lee JK; Park TK; Chang SA; Huh J; Kim JW; Kim DK; Jang JH J Med Genet; 2023 Dec; 61(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 37558401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tailoring the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequenced Variants in the Muiño-Mosquera L; Steijns F; Audenaert T; Meerschaut I; De Paepe A; Steyaert W; Symoens S; Coucke P; Callewaert B; Renard M; De Backer J Circ Genom Precis Med; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e002039. PubMed ID: 29875124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability in gene-based knowledge impacts variant classification: an analysis of FBN1 missense variants in ClinVar. Baudhuin LM; Kluge ML; Kotzer KE; Lagerstedt SA Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 31227806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of 92 patient-driven family studies for reclassification of variants of uncertain significance. Tsai GJ; Rañola JMO; Smith C; Garrett LT; Bergquist T; Casadei S; Bowen DJ; Shirts BH Genet Med; 2019 Jun; 21(6):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 30374176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-evaluation of a Fibrillin-1 Gene Variant of Uncertain Significance Using the ClinGen Guidelines. Kim SW; Kim B; Kim Y; Lee KA Ann Lab Med; 2024 May; 44(3):271-278. PubMed ID: 37840311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. So MK; Jeong TD; Lim W; Moon BI; Paik NS; Kim SC; Huh J Breast Cancer; 2019 Jul; 26(4):510-519. PubMed ID: 30725392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies. Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks. Brnich SE; Rivera-Muñoz EA; Berg JS Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1531-1541. PubMed ID: 30095857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants. Zhang J; Yao Y; He H; Shen J Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2020 Jun; 106(1):e98. PubMed ID: 32176464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Good performance of the criteria of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology in prediction of pathogenicity of genetic variants causing thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Ponińska JK; Bilińska ZT; Truszkowska G; Michalak E; Podgórska A; Stępień-Wojno M; Chmielewski P; Lutyńska A; Płoski R J Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 35078481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical implications of VUS reclassification in a single-centre series from application of ACMG/AMP classification rules specified for Innella G; Ferrari S; Miccoli S; Luppi E; Fortuno C; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Turchetti D J Med Genet; 2024 Apr; 61(5):483-489. PubMed ID: 38160042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework. Tavtigian SV; Greenblatt MS; Harrison SM; Nussbaum RL; Prabhu SA; Boucher KM; Biesecker LG; Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 29300386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variant classification changes over time in the clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory setting. Hahn E; Mighton C; Fisher Y; Wong A; Di Gioacchino V; Watkins N; Mayers J; Bombard Y; Charames GS; Lerner-Ellis J J Med Genet; 2024 Jul; 61(8):788-793. PubMed ID: 38806232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants. Brandt T; Sack LM; Arjona D; Tan D; Mei H; Cui H; Gao H; Bean LJH; Ankala A; Del Gaudio D; Knight Johnson A; Vincent LM; Reavey C; Lai A; Richard G; Meck JM Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 31534211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reclassification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Children with Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes is Predicted by Clinical Factors. Bennett JS; Bernhardt M; McBride KL; Reshmi SC; Zmuda E; Kertesz NJ; Garg V; Fitzgerald-Butt S; Kamp AN Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 40(8):1679-1687. PubMed ID: 31535183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-scale application of ClinGen-InSiGHT APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification criteria leads to substantial reduction in VUS. Yin X; Richardson M; Laner A; Shi X; Ognedal E; Vasta V; Hansen TVO; Pineda M; Ritter D; de Dunnen J; Hassanin E; Lin WL; Borras E; Krahn K; Nordling M; Martins A; Mahmood K; Nadeau E; Beshay V; Tops C; Genuardi M; Pesaran T; Frayling IM; Capellá G; Latchford A; Tavtigian SV; Maj C; Plon SE; Greenblatt MS; Macrae FA; Spier I; Aretz S Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39357517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Challenges in periodic revision of genetic testing results: Comparison of the main classification guidelines and report of a retrospective analysis involving BRCA1/BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance. Andreis TF; de Souza KIW; Vieira IA; Alemar B; Sinigaglia M; de Araújo Rocha YM; Artigalás O; Bittar C; Oliveira Netto CB; Ashton-Prolla P; Rosset C Gene; 2023 Apr; 862():147281. PubMed ID: 36775216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]