218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37559141)
1. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Singh P; Pasquali S; Griffiths EA
BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 32445431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
