These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37559526)

  • 1. Comparison Between Manual and Automated Assessment of Ki-67 in Breast Carcinoma: Test of a Simple Method in Daily Practice.
    Catteau X; Zindy E; Bouri S; Noël JC; Salmon I; Decaestecker C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2023; 22():15330338231169603. PubMed ID: 37559526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility and Prognostic Potential of Ki-67 Proliferation Index when Comparing Digital-Image Analysis with Standard Semi-Quantitative Evaluation in Breast Cancer.
    Ács B; Madaras L; Kovács KA; Micsik T; Tőkés AM; Győrffy B; Kulka J; Szász AM
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28401450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements.
    Boukhar SA; Gosse MD; Bellizzi AM; Rajan K D A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 156(4):607-619. PubMed ID: 33847759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging.
    Hida AI; Omanovic D; Pedersen L; Oshiro Y; Ogura T; Nomura T; Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Moriya T
    Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 32578891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical issues concerning the implementation of Ki-67 proliferative index measurement in breast cancer reporting.
    Harvey J; Thomas C; Wood B; Hardie M; Dessauvagie B; Combrinck M; Frost FA; Sterrett G
    Pathology; 2015 Jan; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 25474507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.
    Luchini C; Pantanowitz L; Adsay V; Asa SL; Antonini P; Girolami I; Veronese N; Nottegar A; Cingarlini S; Landoni L; Brosens LA; Verschuur AV; Mattiolo P; Pea A; Mafficini A; Milella M; Niazi MK; Gurcan MN; Eccher A; Cree IA; Scarpa A
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):712-720. PubMed ID: 35249100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: assessment of proliferative activity using automated Ki-67 immunostaining.
    Dessauvagie B; Thomas A; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrink M; Budhavaram V; Kunjuraman B; Meehan K; Sterrett G; Harvey J
    Pathology; 2019 Dec; 51(7):681-687. PubMed ID: 31630876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of Ki-67 assessment in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
    Jing N; Fang C; Williams DS
    Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28450087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated imaging analysis of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry on whole slide images of cell blocks from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
    Shaker N; Shen R; Limbach AL; Satturwar S; Kobalka P; Ahmadian S; Sun S; Chen W; Lujan G; Esnakula A; Parwani A; Li Z
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(3):205-212. PubMed ID: 38433072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer.
    Dawe M; Shi W; Liu TY; Lajkosz K; Shibahara Y; Gopal NEK; Geread R; Mirjahanmardi S; Wei CX; Butt S; Abdalla M; Manolescu S; Liang SB; Chadwick D; Roehrl MHA; McKee TD; Adeoye A; McCready D; Khademi A; Liu FF; Fyles A; Done SJ
    Lab Invest; 2024 May; 104(5):100341. PubMed ID: 38280634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The human-in-the-loop: an evaluation of pathologists' interaction with artificial intelligence in clinical practice.
    Bodén ACS; Molin J; Garvin S; West RA; Lundström C; Treanor D
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):210-218. PubMed ID: 33590577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential Pitfalls in Diagnostic Digital Image Analysis: Experience with Ki-67 and PHH3 in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
    Hacking SM; Sajjan S; Lee L; Ziemba Y; Angert M; Yang Y; Jin C; Chavarria H; Kataria N; Jain S; Nasim M
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Mar; 216(3):152753. PubMed ID: 31761497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
    Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
    Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note on the validation of a semi-automated image analysis software application for estrogen and progesterone receptor detection in breast cancer.
    Krecsák L; Micsik T; Kiszler G; Krenács T; Szabó D; Jónás V; Császár G; Czuni L; Gurzó P; Ficsor L; Molnár B
    Diagn Pathol; 2011 Jan; 6():6. PubMed ID: 21244664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardization for Ki-67 assessment in moderately differentiated breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of the SAKK 28/12 study.
    Varga Z; Cassoly E; Li Q; Oehlschlegel C; Tapia C; Lehr HA; Klingbiel D; Thürlimann B; Ruhstaller T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123435. PubMed ID: 25885288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of digital and visual methods for Ki-67 assessment in invasive breast carcinomas].
    Kushnarev VA; Artemyeva ES; Kudaybergenova AG
    Arkh Patol; 2018; 80(2):38-42. PubMed ID: 29697670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.