These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37559658)

  • 1. Chest
    Scheese D; Alwatari Y; Rustom S; He G; Puig CA; Julliard WA; Shah RD
    J Thorac Dis; 2023 Jul; 15(7):3593-3604. PubMed ID: 37559658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Verstegen MHP; Slaman AE; Klarenbeek BR; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Rosman C; van Workum F
    World J Surg; 2021 Nov; 45(11):3341-3349. PubMed ID: 34373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Robotic Approach on Post-Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Wu J; Putnam LR; Silva JP; Houghton C; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
    Am Surg; 2022 Oct; 88(10):2499-2507. PubMed ID: 35652374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Morbid Obesity on Post-esophagectomy Leak Rate: a NSQIP Analysis.
    Conroy MA; O'Connor AL; Qureshi AP; Wood SG
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Aug; 27(8):1539-1544. PubMed ID: 37081219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Barium Swallow in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leak following Esophagectomy.
    Roh S; Iannettoni MD; Keech JC; Bashir M; Gruber PJ; Parekh KR
    Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 49(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 27066433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database.
    Kassis ES; Kosinski AS; Ross P; Koppes KE; Donahue JM; Daniel VC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Dec; 96(6):1919-26. PubMed ID: 24075499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term outcomes of Ivor Lewis vs. McKeown esophagectomy: A meta-analysis.
    Xing H; Hu M; Wang Z; Jiang Y
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():950108. PubMed ID: 36386496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost burden of clinically significant esophageal anastomotic leaks-a steep price to pay.
    Agzarian J; Visscher SL; Knight AW; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Nichols FC; Shen KR; Wigle D; Blackmon SH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 May; 157(5):2086-2092. PubMed ID: 30558876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database.
    Sabra MJ; Alwatari YA; Wolfe LG; Xu A; Kaplan BJ; Cassano AD; Shah RD
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Apr; 68(4):370-379. PubMed ID: 31933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Pather K; Deladisma AM; Guerrier C; Kriley IR; Awad ZT
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):896-903. PubMed ID: 33580319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
    Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of vasopressors during esophagectomy is not associated with increased risk of anastomotic leak.
    Walsh KJ; Zhang H; Tan KS; Pedoto A; Desiderio DP; Fischer GW; Bains MS; Jones DR; Molena D; Amar D
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 32944749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: A NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis.
    Hall BR; Flores LE; Parshall ZS; Shostrom VK; Are C; Reames BN
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 120(4):661-669. PubMed ID: 31292967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.