These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37561203)
1. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study. Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Barrachina-Martinez I; González-de-Julián S; Vivas-Consuelo D; Espí-Macías A Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jul; 28(1):76. PubMed ID: 38954099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study. Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study. Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts. Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M; Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study. Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate. Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers. Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis. Atallah S; Kural S; Banda N; Banda A; Bawaney F; Cabral F; Neychev V; Patel C; Larach S Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study. Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience. Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer. Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis. Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study. Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter? Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double-stapled technique? Cavallaro P; Lee GC; Kanters A; Valente M; Holubar SD; Champagne B; Rosen D; Gorgun E; Steele S Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jan; 26(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 38083875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler. Placer C; Enríquez-Navascués JM; Elorza G; Timoteo A; Mugica JA; Borda N; Saralegui Y; Elósegui JL Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Oct; 57(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25203376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes. Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]