These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37561515)

  • 1. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
    Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual target discriminability modulates the Simon effect beyond the fading of distractor-based activation: Insights from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Ellinghaus R; Liepelt R; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Aug; 50(8):842-858. PubMed ID: 38900524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.
    Bräutigam LC; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):91-114. PubMed ID: 37548866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Ulrich R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):837-854. PubMed ID: 34918279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Strategic control over extent and timing of distractor-based response activation": Correction to Jost et al. (2017).
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):564. PubMed ID: 28368156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Lee PS; Sewell DK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategic control over extent and timing of distractor-based response activation.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Löw A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 27732019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control in cross-modal contexts: Abstract feature transitions of task-related but not task-unrelated stimuli modulate the congruency sequence effect.
    Kelber P; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):902-919. PubMed ID: 37883054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task.
    Kelber P; Gierlich M; Göth J; Jeschke MG; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Exp Psychol; 2023 May; 70(3):155-170. PubMed ID: 37830767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional control and priming: The distractor set hypothesis.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Mar; 50(3):347-361. PubMed ID: 37307325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task.
    Mittelstädt V; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1768-1783. PubMed ID: 36403176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14092. PubMed ID: 35569101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
    Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.
    Pratte MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 33155124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility-based early modulation of processing distracting stimulus information.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 34(50):16720-5. PubMed ID: 25505324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.