147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37561690)
1. Predicting mid-pelvic interspinous distance in women using height and pubic arch angle.
Na ED; Baek MJ; Moon JH; Park CW; Yoon J; Lee H; Park SH; Jang JH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289814. PubMed ID: 37561690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women.
Perlman S; Raviv-Zilka L; Levinsky D; Gidron A; Achiron R; Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3255-3265. PubMed ID: 29621904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Neonatal head circumference to maternal mid-transverse pelvic distance ratio as a key anatomical predictor for dystocia: Retrospective case-control study.
Baek MJ; Na ED; Lee H; Park SH; Kim S; Kim T; Jung SH; Jang JH
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38777330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: A new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy.
Liao KD; Yu YH; Li YG; Chen L; Peng C; Liu P; Chen CL; Chen RY; Zhong M; Wang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():208-212. PubMed ID: 29685537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvimetry in nulliparous and primiparous women using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Hampel F; Hallscheidt P; Sohn C; Schlehe B; Brocker KA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(6):1950-1956. PubMed ID: 29464757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision].
Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia?
Spörri S; Thoeny HC; Raio L; Lachat R; Vock P; Schneider H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12076922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI-based pelvimetric measurements as predictors for a successful vaginal breech delivery in the Frankfurt Breech at term cohort (FRABAT).
Klemt AS; Schulze S; Brüggmann D; Louwen F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jan; 232():10-17. PubMed ID: 30453166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pelvic inlet area is associated with birth mode.
Starrach T; Schmidhuber L; Elger L; Franz M; Buechel J; Hübener C; Kolben T; Koliogiannis V; Mahner S; Hasbargen U; Fischer B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 36320156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New MRI Criteria for Successful Vaginal Breech Delivery in Primiparae.
Hoffmann J; Thomassen K; Stumpp P; Grothoff M; Engel C; Kahn T; Stepan H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161028. PubMed ID: 27532122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of normal pelvis morphometry of modern Chinese southern Han female and its correlation with age].
Liu P; Yu YH; Chen CL; Tang YX; Wang L; Mao DR; Xu YK; Chen L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 24284215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term.
Franz M; von Bismarck A; Delius M; Ertl-Wagner B; Deppe C; Mahner S; Hasbargen U; Hübener C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 295(2):351-359. PubMed ID: 28044181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry.
Fine EA; Bracken M; Berkowitz RL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 7369283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT pelvimetry: the foveae are not an accurate landmark for the level of the ischial spines.
Aronson D; Kier R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 1899750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetric measurements as predictors for emergent cesarean delivery in obstructed labor.
Shimaoka R; Takahashi Y; Ono H; Matsui M; Asai K; Iwagaki S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Sep; 19():100216. PubMed ID: 37501741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements?
Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 42(4):181-187. PubMed ID: 32330959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion.
Lenhard MS; Johnson TR; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e107-11. PubMed ID: 19443160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study.
Liselele HB; Boulvain M; Tshibangu KC; Meuris S
BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 10955423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
