152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37561701)
1. Predictive validity of the EVARUCI scale to evaluate risk for pressure injury in critical care patients.
de Souza MFC; Zanei SSV; Whitaker IY
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(Sup8):clxi-clxv. PubMed ID: 37561701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Validity study of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI)].
González-Ruiz JM; Núñez-Méndez P; Balugo-Huertas S; Navarro-de la Peña L; García-Martín MR
Enferm Intensiva; 2008; 19(3):123-29, quiz 130-1. PubMed ID: 18840327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI) and the Norton-MI scale in critically ill patients.
Lospitao-Gómez S; Sebastián-Viana T; González-Ruíz JM; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Dec; 38():76-82. PubMed ID: 29241524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.
Theeranut A; Ninbanphot S; Limpawattana P
Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Jan; 26(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 32368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
Lima-Serrano M; González-Méndez MI; Martín-Castaño C; Alonso-Araujo I; Lima-Rodríguez JS
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28215408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.
Roca-Biosca A; Rubio-Rico L; Fernández MIM; Grau NG; Garijo GT; Fernández FPG
J Wound Care; 2017 Sep; 26(9):528-536. PubMed ID: 28880761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive ability of the EVARUCI scale and COMHON index for pressure injury risk in critically ill patients: A diagnostic accuracy study.
Leal-Felipe MLÁ; Arroyo-López MDC; Robayna-Delgado MDC; Gómez-Espejo A; Perera-Díaz P; Chinea-Rodríguez CD; García-Correa N; Jiménez-Sosa A
Aust Crit Care; 2018 Nov; 31(6):355-361. PubMed ID: 29223567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
de Souza DM; Santos VL; Iri HK; Sadasue Oguri MY
Geriatr Nurs; 2010; 31(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20381710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Validation of EMINA and EVARUCI scales for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers in critical patients].
Roca-Biosca A; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Chacon-Garcés S; Rubio-Rico L; Olona-Cabases M; Anguera-Saperas L; Garcia-Grau N; Tuset-Garijo G; de Molina-Fernández I; Velasco-Guillen MC
Enferm Intensiva; 2015; 26(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25600461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
