These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37562714)

  • 1. Three-dimensional radiographic assessment of immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A novel parameter-based classification.
    Khoury N; Husseini B; Tahchy D; Saadeh C; Ghosn N; Younes R
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 124(6S):101590. PubMed ID: 37562714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular molar region: a cross-sectional study using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ho JY; Ngeow WC; Lim D; Wong CS
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(3):732-738. PubMed ID: 34184752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study.
    Chen H; Wang W; Gu X
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):478. PubMed ID: 34579702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of Virtual CBCT-Based Immediate Implant Planning for Maxillary and Mandibular First Molars.
    Zhang LQ; Duan DH; Wang EB; Wang HL; Liu Z
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Oct; 48(5):386-390. PubMed ID: 34412125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
    Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-Dimensional Alveolar Bone Assessment of Mandibular First Molars with Implications for Immediate Implant Placement.
    Padhye NM; Shirsekar VU; Bhatavadekar NB
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2020; 40(4):e163-e167. PubMed ID: 32559042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
    Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT.
    Sun Y; Hu S; Xie Z; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):76. PubMed ID: 36747164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
    Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
    J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of the angle range in trans-inferior alveolar nerve implantation at the mandibular second molar.
    Wu W; Song L; Liu J; Du L; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Tang Z; Shen M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):928. PubMed ID: 38007495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed Tomography for the Assessment of the Potential Risk After Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sites in the Posterior Mandible.
    Haj Yahya B; Chaushu G; Hamzani Y
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Feb; 47(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 32662837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A cone beam computed tomography study.
    Chrcanovic BR; de Carvalho Machado V; Gjelvold B
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(6):505-14. PubMed ID: 27092357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between ridge morphology and complexity of implant placement planning in the posterior mandible.
    Tözüm MD; Ataman-Duruel ET; Duruel O; Nares S; Tözüm TF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):361-367. PubMed ID: 33593676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
    Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential Circumferential Bone Engagement following Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Mandible: Computed Tomography Assessment.
    Hamzani Y; Yassien E; Moskovich L; Becker T; Chaushu G; Haj Yahya B
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Aug; 57(9):. PubMed ID: 34577797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of bone anatomical morphology of mandibular molars on dental implant based on CBCT.
    Kong ZL; Wang GG; Liu XY; Ye ZY; Xu DQ; Ding X
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):528. PubMed ID: 34654414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ATM technique - a novel radiographic technique to assess the position of buccal shelf implants.
    Prasad AS; Sivakumar A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(5):20210346. PubMed ID: 35084213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.